Talk:Foursquare Church

Christianity: Arminianism / Charismatic / Evangelical Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Arminianism (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Charismatic Christianity (assessed as High-importance).
	Evangelical Christianity portal This article is supported by WikiProject Evangelical Christianity (assessed as Mid-importance).

Religion: New religious movements Start‑class Low‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by New religious movements work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

On 26 December 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from The Foursquare Church to Foursquare Church. The result of the discussion was moved.

Archives

Archive 1

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on International Church of the Foursquare Gospel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20041215152545/http://www.foursquarenwmensretreat.org:80/2002/details.html to http://www.foursquarenwmensretreat.org/2002/details.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:20, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on International Church of the Foursquare Gospel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:07, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Structure section

User:Avatar317, please read WP:ABOUTSELF, which says in relevant part: Self-published and questionable sources may be used as sources of information about themselves, usually in articles about themselves or their activities, without the self-published source requirement that they be published experts in the field . . . There is no reason why the Foursquare Church's bylaws cannot be used as a source to describe the denomination's internal organization. What is more beneficial to the article: having a section that identifies how the denomination is structured or having no structure section at all? Every other church article on Wikipedia has a section on internal organization, and often these sections are heavily sourced from bylaws and other internal documents. Ltwin (talk) 05:59, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ltwin: The reason we use INDEPENDENT sources is so that articles aren't WP:UNDUE ly full of excessive detail about an organization/corporation/entity that is of interest only to that org/com/entity's marketing department and a few who adore the corporation. We don't devote multiple paragraphs to the corporate structure of a company unless it is documented in Independent Sources that the company has some NOTABLE type of management structure/hierarchy.

There may be many articles which you can find as counter-examples to my statement, but that only shows how many low-quality articles exist in Wikipedia; it doesn't speak to the POLICY which governs this. ---Avatar317 ^(talk) 16:48, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No. Structures of churches is important because structure reflects the church's theology. Does the church believe in a central authority? Are bishops in charge? Are local congregations in charge? All of those are important reflections of the church's teachings. There is nothing "promotional" in describing how a church's hierarchy functions. And as for policy, Wikipedia has a policy using self-published sources in this case, WP:ABOUTSELF. Furthermore, the church's organization does not have to be "notable." Per WP:NNC, notability guidelines don't apply to content within articles. The Foursquare Church is notable, so we can have an article that not only describes its history and beliefs but also how it organizes itself. Yes, we should keep the main things the main things, but one section briefly describing the denomination's organization is not going to break the article. Ltwin (talk) 18:35, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 26 December 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:09, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Foursquare Church → Foursquare Church – Use of "The" is inconsistent in literature and on the Church's own websites and history. Facts707 (talk) 12:37, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom and WP:THE. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:10, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.