Talk:Four Star Favorites

Four Star Favorites was nominated as a Music good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (April 14, 2020). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Jazz

	Jazz portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of jazz on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JazzWikipedia:WikiProject JazzTemplate:WikiProject JazzJazz articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Four Star Favorites/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: David Fuchs (talk · contribs) 12:38, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

~~Look for review next week. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^talk 12:38, 12 April 2020 (UTC)~~ Overall the article is a solid start, but it needs additional work to meet criteria in my eyes.[reply]

I think the main issue is one of broad coverage and comprehensiveness; there's basically only four to five paragraphs of body material here, and I don't think that really is enough coverage. There's all of four reviews of the material, covering a single paragraph; next to nothing on recording or legacy. The lead contains content not found in the body.
- As an additional problem, I think the article presumes far too much prior knowledge of Shaw's career. He switches bands in the space of a sentence and no explanation is given. A more thorough explanation of his career would help contextualize the record better.
Sections of "Release History" and "Chart Performance" are apparently unreferenced.
I have issues with some of the sourcing used, which seems to take personal opinion and treat it as fact, e.g. Acknowledged as the most cerebral of the dance bandleaders, is cited to a single opinion. Later on, the explanation for why he quit and went away for his health is again given to a single comment. This really isn't the rigorous reliable sourcing I'd expect for an established historical arts figure.
File:Four Star Favorites.png—do you have any evidence the copyright was not renewed, hence the Public Domain designation?

--Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^talk 17:08, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Four Star Favorites.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:37, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]