Talk:Four-sided die

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Role-playing games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of role-playing games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Role-playing gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Role-playing gamesTemplate:WikiProject Role-playing gamesrole-playing game articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dungeons & Dragons Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of the Dungeons & Dragons WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dungeons & Dragons-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, or join the discussion, where you can join the project and find out how to help!Dungeons & DragonsWikipedia:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsTemplate:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsDungeons & Dragons articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

D&D to-do:

view

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Merge : Various articles
Stubs : Dungeoneer's Survival Guide, Swords & Spells, Variant Dungeons & Dragons games, More...
Update : Rewrite to be out-of-universe: Companions of the Hall, Dark Sun, Elf (Dungeons & Dragons)
Verify : add sources to novels planned for merge to List of Dragonlance novels
Other : Collaboration: Dave Arneson, Drow (Dungeons & Dragons)

Stub

Why is this listed as a stub? Look fine to me. --Drmike 14:27, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a stub, perhaps all such dice articles should be merged into one page? Polyhedral dice, maybe?

NGDA

Who are they? Google reveals nothing of use (except this page) --Lardarse 05:57, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Caltrops

Would the following link be sufficient to act as a source for the Caltrop nickname of the four-sided dice? http://diceaholic.wordpress.com/2012/01/31/dungeons-and-dragons-dice-dd-dice/ I'm not very well versed in the notability rules for sources. 98.202.95.55 (talk) 17:25, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It could be - the best place to go would be WP:RS/N. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 17:41, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That page is daunting. Do I just edit the talk page and ask if it is appropriate? 98.202.95.55 (talk) 00:03, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Go to where it says 'Click here to start a new discussion' and follow that link to ask your question. 24.12.74.21 (talk) 01:46, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The source is not reliable as it is not the blog of a well-known expert. Binksternet (talk) 20:16, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm fairly certain 4-siders (especially the original yellow TSR ones) have been called "caltrops" (when they're called anything printable at all) by anyone unfortunate enough to step on one barefoot. Given that their original users had started as medieval-focused wargamers, it would be more surprising if they didn't use the term. That's going to be a bear to document, though, because it's gamer slang, the sort of thing that nobody ever really wrote down. By the time the academics of the world even noticed that the RPG subculture existed, those needle-sharp TSR four-siders (which I know from personal experience could, and did, draw blood) had been long ago replaced by less pointy ones, so the use of the "caltrop" nickname was probably less widespread. Worldwalker (talk) 20:42, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]