Talk:Founding of Wallachia/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 14:28, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:32, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
The article is reasonably well written and complies sufficiently with the manual of style.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
Reference #66[1] appears to be an unreliable source.

Done ~~(the unreliable source is deleted) Borsoka (talk) 19:07, 17 November 2010 (UTC)~~[reply]

I assume good faith for all off-line sources.

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It appears both broad and focussed.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
~~File:Terratransalpina.png has no description or author information.~~

Done (the map is deleted; otherwise, it is an excellent map which does not contradict to the sources referred to in the article, but I am not in the position to fix it) Borsoka (talk) 19:07, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Just a few points to be addressed. On Hold for seven days. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:53, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks for fixing those point. as you say, it is a pity about the map, but images do need sourcing information. I am haoppy to pass this as a Good Article.