Talk:Foundation for a Drug-Free World

Scientology Low‑importance

	This article is supported by WikiProject Scientology, a collaborative effort to help develop and improve Wikipedia's coverage of Scientology. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on Scientology-related topics. See WikiProject Scientology and Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ.ScientologyWikipedia:WikiProject ScientologyTemplate:WikiProject ScientologyScientology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Addictions and recovery Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Addictions and recovery, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of addiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Addictions and recoveryWikipedia:WikiProject Addictions and recoveryTemplate:WikiProject Addictions and recoveryaddiction and recovery articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Their site lists lots of inaccurate and untrue things, not that i like illegal drugs or anything but it's blatant misinformation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.45.160.38 (talk) 23:38, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bias

This article needs more work to:

substantiate the claims made (unscientific, misleading)
use more neutral language
maintain a neutral POV
find better quality sources (some are newsblogs and primary sources)
fill out an actual history of the group (who founded it, when, and where)

We don't get to violate NPOV just because we're discussing the Scientologists. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:33, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

United Nations "partnered"

Scientology is notorious for coat-tailing on United Nations calendar dates. Other than a Scientology press release in a community newspaper, are there any WP:RS sources that say that the United Nations was even aware of the event, never mind "partnered"? 199.119.233.133 (talk) 05:59, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree and tagged the statement. If the UN did partner there would be some statement from the UN about it, not only a mention in a local newspaper that most likely got its information from the subject of the article. Sjö (talk) 06:33, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am removing this absurd claim, it's not mentioned anywhere by the UN and there is no alternative Reliable Source. Mramoeba (talk) 13:04, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This seems to be what they're referring to. Gmarmstrong (talk) 23:25, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Wikipedia relies on the use on secondary reliable sources. If you are in any doubt what constitutes a primary source have a look here: sources. Also please familiarise yourself with what we mean by 'reliable' and editing with a neutral point of view. @Neutroinfo: If these are your first edits as suggested by your history I would suggest editing some less contentious topics, maybe trying The Wikipedia Adventure and If you have any questions please feel free to ask in the Wikipedia:Teahouse Thanks.

I have copied this from talk page as It occurred to me perhaps the user is unfamiliar with where messages can be found. Mramoeba (talk) 10:20, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]