Talk:Foundation for Economic Education/GA2

GA Review

This is GA review #2

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: North8000 (talk · contribs) 19:05, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am starting a review on this article. I non-passed it on its first nomination; primary editor is agreeable to this. North8000 (talk) 19:05, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Review comments

GA criteria final checklist

Well-written

Meets this criteria. Is well written. IMHO has a minor case of overlinking, but that is arguable, and not a significant issue either way. North8000 (talk) 17:38, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removed links per WP:OVERLINK.--Abel (talk) 18:30, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. Confirming, minor case of overlinking is resolved. North8000 (talk)

Factually accurate and verifiable

Meets this criteria. IMHO strings of 6 or 7 cites can actually detract from this and are unusual, but this is either a minor issue or a non-issue here. I think that Abel deserves an award for the immense amount of difficult work that they did untangling and repairing the previous citation / reference issues.North8000 (talk) 17:41, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bundling citations per citation content guideline solved that problem. --Abel (talk) 18:01, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It does not really address the main reasons behind my comment, but again, it is not necessary to do so. North8000 (talk) 02:37, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Broad in its coverage

Meets this criteria based on reasonably-available sources. North8000 (talk) 17:31, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A note on "reasonably-available sources" since I have run into this before. From the identifying reliable sources content guideline:

Additionally, an archived copy of the media must exist. It is convenient, but by no means necessary, for the archived copy to be accessible via the Internet.

Abel (talk) 18:18, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each

Meets this criteria. North8000 (talk) 17:36, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute

Meets this criteria. Is stable.North8000 (talk) 17:32, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Illustrated, if possible, by images

Passes this criteria. Has 6 images; the 2 non-free ones have article-specific use rationales. North8000 (talk) 19:30, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This article passes as a Wikipedia Good Article. On behalf of Wikipedians, a big THANK YOU to Abel for the IMMENSE amount of difficult work they did and perseverance that they exhibited to get this article into shape. Congratulations! I will implement the details shortly. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 02:45, 30 January 2013 (UTC) Reviewer[reply]