Talk:Foundation's Edge
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Characters
[edit]Questions
[edit]- Imagine -- Which mental fibre of Novi's was different?--Hillgentleman 18:05, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
Plot
[edit]- The plot of Foundation's Edge is very similar to the plot of The End of Eternity.Hillgentleman 11:45, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
Deserves far more than just the plot! :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 17:00, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Foundation's Edge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080926040513/http://wiredforbooks.org/isaacasimov/ to http://wiredforbooks.org/isaacasimov/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:38, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Only one review and its's negative?
[edit]There's only one review here and it's very negative. I'd propose that unless folks want to add other reviews, we delete the "Reception" section entirely.