Talk:Foucault–Habermas debate

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Continental / Contemporary Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Continental philosophy
	Contemporary philosophy

Untitled

What exactly is this debate? Can you give me a sentence stating something that one would accept and the other would reject?

I've removed these lines, as potentially copyright infringing:

The Foucault/Habermas debate is a discussion among social and political theorists about which paradigm of critique – Michel Foucault's or Jürgen Habermas's – is philosophically and practically superior, especially with regard to the nature and role of power in contemporary society.

They seem to be lifted directly from the blurb of one of the books mentioned as sources [1]

Also, I don't see much content in this article that couldn't be better covered within articles on Foucault, Habermas, or the topics they cover.