Jump to content

Talk:Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing Adoptions Act of 2008

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Alinster17. Peer reviewers: Alinster17.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:43, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

[edit]

Created 10.23.2010 Janedubs (talk) 16:02, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

[edit]

This article should be eligible for appearing on the main page as a "Did you know" entry, if it is nominated it soon; it is supposed to be nominated within 5 days of being created or significantly (5x) expanded.

The instructions for nominating it are at Template talk:Did you know. Basically, all you need to do is take this code: 

{{NewDYKnom| article= | hook=... that ? | status=new | author=  }}

and write the hook, a concise and interesting bit of info from the article beginning with "... that" and ending with a question mark. The info from the hook has to be present in the article and supported (in the article) with a citation. Someone will double-check to make sure the source says what it's claimed to say.

Once you've come up with a hook, fill in your username as the author and fill the title of the article, then add the above code, including your hook following the "hook=" part, to the top of the appropriate section for the day the article was started on the DYK template talk page. The code will produce an entry formatted like the others. After that, just keep an eye on the entry; if anyone brings up an issue with it, try to address it. I'll keep an eye out as well. If everything goes well, it will appear on the Main Page for several hours a few days from now.--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 19:35, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback

[edit]

The first thing that I noticed was the massive list of links. It is important to remember that Wikipedia is not a repository of links. If the organizations are notable enough to be mentioned, they should actually be described in prose form. If they aren't notable enough to be mentioned (which most are probably not), they shouldn't be linked to at all. At the very least, I think you should cut down the list and move it to the External Links section.

Here are some questions that I think should be answered by this article (that aren't yet):

  • What is a "tribe" in this context?
  • How will the plan reduce deficits?
  • What will the $323 million in direct spending go towards?
  • When was the bill introduced to the House / Senate?

One other thing to keep in mind is that the lead paragraph should summarize information that is present in the body of the article. Thus, information that appears in the lead should be repeated or elaborated upon somewhere in the body of the text. The relevant guideline is WP:LEAD.

Hope this helps! Feel free to leave a note here, on my talk page, or via email if you need anything else. --Cryptic C62 · Talk 03:42, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing Adoptions Act of 2008. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:27, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of information on the implementation of this act on the state level

[edit]

Since this act was passed in 2008 on the federal level, many states have passed their own acts that have created their own versions of extended foster care. California was one of the first to implement a new law (AB12) in 2010 that created an extended foster care program that provided extensive support past ILP services, including financial assistance until age 21.[1] The amount of assistant offered to foster youth varies from state to state, and some states still do not have a fully implemented program in place. The "Future of the Legislation" section should perhaps be removed and replaced with a section on the implementation of the act.

Additionally, although the article states that the federal government has said this act will decrease deficits, it is from my personal experience in the AB12 program in California that the inefficiencies associated with plenty of red tape have caused substantial unnecessary spending. For example, nonminor dependents who move from the original county they entered the system in must be visited by a social worker from that county every month, regardless of where they move. Instead of simply transferring the cases over to the new county, social workers are forced to fly all over the country to see their clients, which results in a waste of money, time and quality of aid. That being said, it is perhaps wise to also include the spending and savings of individual state programs since the implementation of this act is almost completely at the state level.

Alinster17 (talk) 04:22, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ http://www.calyouthconn.org/ab12-implementation

Expansion of the first bullet of "Changes" Section

[edit]

The first bullet under "Changes" is rather vague. It does not explicitly state that the federal government is awarding grants to programs who have implemented one or more of the required goals (see [1] for more info). The wording saying that it "allow[s] all states the option provide kinship guardianship assistance payments" is also a bit misleading since these grants (24 in total) were awarded to individual centers and programs in cities, such as United Way of California, Pasadena.[2] Alinster17 (talk) 04:43, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ https://cbexpress.acf.hhs.gov/index.cfm?event=website.viewPrinterFriendly&issueid=118
  2. ^ http://www.nrcpfc.org/grantees.html
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Fostering_Connections_to_Success_and_Increasing_Adoptions_Act_of_2008&oldid=1202112112"