Talk:Fortune-telling

Occult Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occult, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the occult on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OccultWikipedia:WikiProject OccultTemplate:WikiProject OccultOccult articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Skepticism High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

/Archive 1

Additional references

A case related to fortune telling [1], reported in the Journal of Behavioral Addictions. HealthyGirl (talk) 14:46, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external Fortune-telling. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:09, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Too trite

Lots of banal editorializing:

 "naïve selection of something that have happened from a mass of things that haven't, the clever interpretation of ambiguities, or a brazen announcement of the inevitable."

Etc. Unwikipedic, IMHO. Zezen (talk) 10:47, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

and this: "Popular media outlets like The New York Times have explained to their American readers that although 5000 years ago, soothsayers were prized advisers to the Assyrians, they lost respect and reverence during the rise of Reason in the 17th and 18th centuries." No reference other than the NYT is given, so "outletS" is unwarranted. And 'explain' should be "stated" or some such thing. --2607:FEA8:D5DF:1AF0:91:E984:EBBC:5E49 (talk) 10:28, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The NYT text should clearly be removed (unless the date is a typo), as there is no evidence at all of Assyrian rulers employing soothsayers 5000 years ago, before the earliest Akkadian texts, and before the earliest rulers in the Assyrian King List.European Prehistorian (talk) 11:18, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Clairvoyant

Article says:

Terms for one who claims to see into the future include

1. fortune teller, crystal-gazer, spaewife, seer, soothsayer, sibyl, clairvoyant, and prophet;

related terms which might include this among other abilities are

2. oracle, augur, and visionary.

(Numbers added for purposes of the present discussion.) I think "clairvoyant" should go in the second list, not the first, as a clairvoyant may claim an ability to communicate with the dead, without predicting the future. Other of the terms on the first list may similarly belong to the second; e.g., perhaps a spaewife may do magic without predicting the future (but I don't know about that). Maybe the simplest solution would be to put all the terms in the second list, e.g. like this:

A person who claims to see into the future may be described as a fortune teller, crystal-gazer, spaewife, seer, soothsayer, sibyl, clairvoyant, prophet, oracle, augur, or visionary, though each of these terms may describe other extrasensory or supernatural abilities as well.

On the other hand, I suppose e.g. "fortune teller" exclusively describes a person with this specific claimed ability, so that solution may be unnecessarily radical.

Thoughts? Nø (talk) 09:44, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Nigerian fortune tellers" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Nigerian fortune tellers has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 13 § Nigerian fortune tellers until a consensus is reached. CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:22, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Science

What was earth created 43.245.122.5 (talk) 16:40, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

North Korea Persecutes Fortune-tellers

"The North Pyongan source said that authorities’ efforts against superstition have included campaigns against fortune tellers." - "Sticky rice cake stuck to North Korean colleges sparks crackdown on superstition" at Radio Free Asia

Why not an article on persecutory campaigns against fortune-tellers?

Anyway, thanks for reading, Apisite (talk) 04:11, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]