Talk:Fortress Europe

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fortress Europe article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Europe Low‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Europe, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to European topics of a cross-border nature on Wikipedia.EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject EuropeTemplate:WikiProject EuropeEurope articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: European / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	European military history task force
	World War II task force

Early unsectioned discussion

Fortress Europe was also the name given to Germany's territories after the conquering of France. Oberiko 01:31, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Original "Forstress Europe"

I visited Gibraltar recently and it seems that the british built "Fortress Europe" there 1840. At least of what I could read on the huge walls of the fortress. 94.191.168.130 (talk) 18:43, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality

This: Keeping the strangers out isn't very NPOV. Article needs some work and sourcing. - FrancisTyers 12:38, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tidied a littlePhilipPage 00:10, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Limits of the concept

In Spain, at least, the concept is used (pejoratively) to define the idea that Europe should become less open to immigration. It is usually used by those suppotring greater openess to immigration. Anyhow it is not used to describe anti-globalization or anti-mundialization in trade such as some green parties or leftist parties. --Varano 19:14, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In the Netherlands, the concept is used in a similar manner. To be honest, I was quite surprised to find this article instead of the comment on Europe's strict border regime. If I find some time in the near future, I'll add an article for that and append a disambiguation link. Jeroenm (talk) 21:22, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. See e.g. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] and many, many others. -- Mvuijlst (talk) 14:35, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External PDF link

This might be a useful link for the article page. But since I am a new user, I am hesistant to place it directly on the article page. The following PDF file is in english and contains a list of deaths ascribed to 'fortress europe' since 1993 by non-profit organisation UNITED. This list is part of an art project by 'Stedelijk Museum Bureau Amsterdam'. See: http://www.smba.nl/static/nl/events/the-list/the-list.pdf 145.222.138.172 10:47, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll look into this document if I get to writing the article about Fortress Europe's 'EU' meaning (see the discussion above) Jeroenm (talk) 21:26, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image

A better image would be Mediterranean coast guard patrols or border posts, since it is more related to the concept. Does anyone have a good one? --Joffeloff 15:03, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

99% vanished

By the way, 99% of the content of the article was deleted recently. Check the history. Jidanni 03:44, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fixing the article.

Okay, I went back and fixed this thing up so that it's no longer just a stub bashing European immigration or the lack thereof. I reinserted the material about the British battle honour, as well as sectioning off a reedited note about the Atlantic Wall and the use of the term to describe military fortifications. Then I added a section on the modern uses of the term inside and outside Europe, which is where I dropped the (now NPOV friendly) immigration items. If anyone wants to expand the immigration section, please do, but bear in mind: if you just trash the entire article again, then I WILL come after you and eat your liver. 65.37.15.60 (talk) 02:56, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Post war usage

This section is in clear violation of WP:V WP:NOR and WP:NPOV. Specifically see WP:V WP:SYNTHESIS and WP:WikiVoice.

Using Europe when what is meant is the European Union they are not synonymous.
"or as a pejorative description of the state of immigration into the European Union." No source (WP:V.
"Currently, within Europe,..." This is POV a statement of fact presented in the passive narrative voice of Wikipedia (breaks WP:WikiVoice)
"Conservatives all over Europe" what does conservative mean? For example the British Conservatives have little in common with Christian Democratic parties so are CDs conservative?
"Conservatives all over Europe want to end the Schengen Agreement" No source (violation ov WP:V) Besides as far as I know those countries outside the Schengen area but inside the European Union have no fixed opinion on this.
- Which is the conservative party in Ireland?

This is not an extensive list but a sample of some of the things that need fixing.

Unless someone is willing to spend some time fixing this section in the near future, I suggest that it is move to this talk page and not put back until after the obvious policy violations are fixed. -- PBS (talk) 13:48, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@PBS: I don't have an issue with your proposal. I've seen the term used in a contemporary context, but polemically, rather than an exploration of what the term actually means. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:29, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"illegals"

I am not a wikipedia editor and so will not change the page, but use of the dehumanising term "illegals" has no place in any article, least of all one regarding Europe (that phrase is part of US informal english). Claiming asylum is not illegal; if you do not qualify for asylum then at worst you could be an "illegal immigrant" but even this phrase has a pretty ugly history, preferred phrasing might be "undocumented migrants" or similar. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.100.0.227 (talk) 16:46, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]