Talk:Fortran 95 language features

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

Fortran 95 vs fortran 2003

Perhaps you could add there should be a small note that the newest fortran is called fortran 2003, but most compilers implement fortran 95. As far as I can see the present article only described fortran 95... Nice article though.. :)

Article is a copy&paste from Metcalf's f90 tutorial

Check out [http://wwwasdoc.web.cern.ch/wwwasdoc/WWW/f90/language-elements.html Language elements by Michael Metcalf]. Is that a copyright violation? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.237.79.16 (talk • contribs)

Well, this page was created by Mike himself

(I can witness that, and provide proofs if required). However, the point is moot: I'm not sure what happens if the same text is published under different licenses. I'll try to get a clarification and get back. Duja► 10:20, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There was no license provided on the linked page, so by default, there would be no right to re-use. Whereas Michael himself posted the content here, I would presume that the license he implicitly accepted via submission would carry. (I'm not a lawyer, merely a somewhat-educated lay person.) --Mr Wednesday 23:29, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As User:Duja mentioned, Mike created this article himself. Mike discussed this a bit in a comp.lang.fortran posting at the time (Sept 29th, 2006), saying that it was based on tutorials of his which had no copyright problems. So if anyone has any doubts, use Google to find the discussion in c.l.f. --Wws 14:42, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]