Talk:Fort Pierce, Florida

Florida Low‑importance

	Florida portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

local map of gardens

local map of gardens —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.254.177.108 (talk) 11:59, 5 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Notable people section

I removed Linwood Fuller from the notable section because he does not have his own Wikipedia article, which is needed to establish notability. I listed his information below in the event another editor creates a Wikipedia page for him. "Linwood Fuller, Boat designer and Artist" Thanks!--Fraulein451 (talk) 02:40, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: here and here. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 00:46, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

History

not one word about history? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.242.102.242 (talk) 19:14, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Fort Pierce, Florida. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20150801191315/http://lincolnparkmainstreet.org/ to http://www.lincolnparkmainstreet.org

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:37, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Fort Pierce, Florida. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:42, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fort Pierce Inlet Fort Pierce Florida photo D Ramey Logan.jpg to appear as POTD soon

Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:Fort Pierce Inlet Fort Pierce Florida photo D Ramey Logan.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on February 15, 2017. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2017-02-15. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:11, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the day

The inlet at Fort Pierce, a city of nearly 43,000 in Florida. The area around the inlet is Fort Pierce Inlet State Park, which consists of beaches, dunes and a coastal hammock between the Atlantic Ocean and the waters of Tucker Cove.Photograph: Don Ramey Logan Jr.

Archive – More featured pictures...

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Fort Pierce, Florida. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.lincolnparkmainstreet.org/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130809202016/http://stlucieco.gov/marine_center.htm to http://www.stlucieco.gov/marine_center.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:39, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Inlet

Was the Fort Pierce Inlet a natural inlet or was it man made by engineer’s? 2601:58C:4080:B590:FC11:6B87:94C8:86C (talk) 20:11, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox contents

Transferred from User talk:Magnolia677#Your edits to Fort Pierce, Florida:

I am reverting your removal of the city attorney and clerk information from the infobox for that article. As I have already pointed out to you in the edit summary, your reasoning (non-notable) is not applicable -- the notability guidelines *do not* apply to the content within an article, they apply to the creation or retention of an article itself. If you want to remove that content from the article, please make a policy-based argument for doing so. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 19:50, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

@Swatjester: Please look at the infobox examples at WP:USCITIES and Template:Infobox settlement. None of them add the level of city official you wish to include. Neither does New York City. A city attorney would typically only be included if the office was both notable and elected (see Los Angeles City Attorney); the city attorney and clerk are neither in Fort Pierce. Moreover, MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE states: "The less information it contains, the more effectively it serves that purpose." Please explain why the city attorney and city clerk need inclusion in the infobox. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:16, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain why they don't merit inclusion. Fort Pierce is a city with a population of less than 50,000. New York City has literally more people in its government than the entire population of Ft. Pierce. So that's not really a good comparison. The template page's examples are Detroit and Chicago, both similarly incomparable in size. I don't find either set of examples persuasive. Regardless, WP:USCITIES says the following: This section should include a description of the local city government, such as the mayor's office, city council or legislature, city manager (if applicable), and how these entities interact. For larger cities, you might include information on the local government politics as well. Avoid listing all city council members, because this information becomes obsolete fairly quickly since a subset of the members typically changes every 1 or 2 years, wrong information is worse than not having it. Avoid listing the heads of every department, because this section is not the yellow pages. These positions are neither city council members, nor would two entries out of a total of four constitute "heads of every department." They are, however, significant and important positions within the city government. Furthermore, the example for Detroit lists their entire city council, in direct contradiction of the WP:USCITIES guideline. And of course, WP:USCITIES is a guideline that explicitly says there are no requirements to follow it in editing. In a small town, with few government positions, every position is relevant and noteworthy. In any event, a lack of independent notability is not a valid reasoning for removal of content within an article (except for list articles where it's a specified criteria, which isn't applicable here). Content coverage within a given article or list (i.e. whether something is noteworthy enough to be mentioned within the article or list) is governed by the principle of due weight, balance, and other content policies. Your removal was not predicated on WP:DUE, WP:BALANCE nor a content policy. So, I'm struggling to see the argument for why the project is enhanced by not including these positions. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 20:34, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]