Talk:Fort Peck Dam

Montana Low‑importance

	Montana portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Montana, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Montana on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MontanaWikipedia:WikiProject MontanaTemplate:WikiProject MontanaMontana articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places Mid‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dams High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dams, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dams on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DamsWikipedia:WikiProject DamsTemplate:WikiProject DamsDam articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

It appears that the section on the dam failure during construction is plagarized from a particular source because there are references to images in the text that do not accompany the article. Two references in the "Notes and references" section are cited that might be source for this section of the article. One source is a US Army Corps of Engineers report from 1939, so I assume its in the public domain. The other however cited source is of a published professional paper that may not be freely available. --Ltvine 01:48, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I replaced the stamp image originally in this article because of the copyright limitations described in the {{USPSstamp}} rights tag. The replacement aerial view also more fully describes the scale of the dam, and powerhouses. I'll add additional public domain images to this article in the near future, one of which will represent the spillway as the postage stamp by Margaret Bourke-White did. Thanks. --Ltvine 17:08, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is "friction angle" the same as "angle of repose"?

The following sentence appears in the section: Fort Peck Dam#Dam failure during construction:

The core material turned out to be much stronger than expected (having a friction angle of approximately 29 degrees) and was carried out into the slide nearly in a solid mass, making it unlikely that the core was the weak point in the slide.

Is "friction angle" a synonym for "angle of repose"? If so, I would like to change the wording to angle of repose and link it. --Teratornis 15:24, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Fort Peck Dam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:39, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Coastline

Fort Peck Lake doesn't really have a longer coastline than California, right? Not if you use a consistent measurement between both. It seems to me this figure should be double-checked from another source.

If *true*, though, this stat should probably not be included in the second sentence of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.145.224.113 (talk) 23:37, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Fort Peck Dam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.nwo.usace.army.mil/html/Lake_Proj/fortpeck/welcome.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050312053600/http://www.nwo.usace.army.mil/html/Lake_Proj/fortpeck/dam.html to https://www.nwo.usace.army.mil/html/Lake_Proj/fortpeck/dam.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070220090022/http://www.nwd-mr.usace.army.mil/rcc/reports/showrep.cgi?4BULL0MR1 to http://www.nwd-mr.usace.army.mil/rcc/reports/showrep.cgi?4BULL0MR1
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nwo.usace.army.mil/html/Lake_Proj/fortpeck/welcome.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:20, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tyrannosaurus

I was redirected to Fort Peck Dam from a link to Fort Peck Reservoir in an article about T. Rex. Neither the Dam or the Lake article have anything about the T. Rex found there. Has someone edited it out? It seems like it would be worth including. Here is a link. https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/the-nations-t-rex-how-a-montana-moms-hike-led-to-an-incredible-discovery/2019/06/01/2bd276f8-8252-11e9-bce7-40b4105f7ca0_story.html There is a relevant section in another article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_M._Russell_National_Wildlife_Refuge#Notable_fossil_discoveries Nlight2 (talk) 08:58, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]