Talk:Fort Lewis (Washington)

United States: Government / Washington / Seattle Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington - Seattle.

Military history: Fortifications / North America / United States C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Requested move 9 November 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: NOT MOVED: Consensus is to not move the article. (non-admin closure) Spekkios (talk) 23:50, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

– The Washington location is clearly the primary topic for this name, as others have far fewer pageviews or Google Ngram results. Was moved without discussion, but I think it should be reconsidered. Sounder Bruce 21:53, 9 November 2021 (UTC)— Relisting. —usernamekiran • sign the guestbook • (talk) 15:38, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 00:08, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As much as I prefer the prominence, the disambiguation page says all we need to know about necessitating specificity. While it may be primary for people who live in the region or are researching the region or have some interest/attachment to the military - that is completely relative in that same sense for the other pages as well. I might add that having there been two Fort Lewis Army bases could easily be confusing if not specified. Additionally - a bit of a flaw in the nomination is that "it has far more page views" than the others. Well - as until before this move it was the default page that someone went to when just searching for fort lewis - that would make sense. How many of those views were as a result of people trying to get to the other Fort Lewis pages? Combining all those other pages' views and subtracting them from the Washington one will put that into more perspective. At the end of the day, greater specificity is never a bad thing when it comes to an encyclopedic reference. Picard's Facepalm (talk) 16:52, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The other Fort Lewis existed for 13 years in the late 19th century and hardly has any relevance today. The Fort Lewis in Washington is going to be the first to come to mind to anyone in the country who is aware of major military installations. Sounder Bruce 03:36, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - Probably not a good thing to proclaim what is on everyone else's mind in the world when they come to an encyclopedic reference and are looking for info. To put it simply - that's not up to you. A lot of history research is done on WP - much for places you have never even heard of before. Fort Lewis WA/JBLM isn't even the first thing that pops up in a google search. Again - specificity is never a bad thing in an encyclopedic reference. Picard's Facepalm (talk) 18:38, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
weak Oppose - Fort Lewis College is a likely contender for primary topic here - keeping in mind that many people looking for it will probably query "Fort Lewis", similar to how one would query "Michigan State" referring to the university, leaving out the word "University". Given that this seems to be a common convention, it's possible the college could be the primary topic, but not conclusively so, ~~as there is the issue of long-term significance (the fort) versus usage (the college, which was only established in 1911)~~ Well would you look at that, the fort is actually younger.. nothing to see here!01:17, 18 November 2021 (UTC). Of course, that's based on the assumption that readers looking for "Fort Lewis" are looking for the college, which I have no evidence of, but the pageviews between the dab and the college seem to support the possibility. ASUKITE 01:15, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

7th ID Subordinate units

This page currently lists units as subordinate to 7th Infantry division in error. The only units subordinate to 7th ID are 1/2 SBCT (formerly 3/2 SBCT), 2/2 SBCT and 16th CAB The rest are MSCs to I Corps. 2601:603:5081:51B0:DAE2:709E:A6E7:42C0 (talk) 08:15, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]