Talk:Fort Frederick (Kingston, Ontario)

Military history: Fortifications / British / Canadian / European / North America

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force
	British military history task force
	Canadian military history task force
	European military history task force
	North American military history task force

Canada: Ontario Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.

WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008

Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 15:22, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Museum and NHS (info)boxes

The red "National Historic Site" box within the infobox suggests Fort Frederick is a national historic site. White it is a part of two others, it doesn't hold the designation under its own name. One possible fix is to leave "Fort Frederick" as the title on this box, but subscribe, below that, two banners which indicate the names of each of the two NHS's of which it is a unit. It's also part of Rideau Canal World Heritage Site, and it might be desirable to note this (looking at how WHSs might be identified elsewhere).

It's not clear to me how to edit an infobox, so I'm open to learning how to make this one more accurate and attractive. I submit that the red NHS box looks more like a warning than helpful information. Yoho2001 (talk) 08:59, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're right - infobox templates pertaining to NHSCs should only be used when the article subject is a NHSC in its own right. Otherwise, it should be left to the text of the article to explain the circumstances. I've removed that template, as per your comment. Good catch. The red box is the country colour assigned to Canada - red. It doesn't really look like a warning to me. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 20:37, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fort Frederick (Kingston, Ontario). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110605032733/http://www.pc.gc.ca/lhn-nhs/on/plan/pd-mp_KingFortifications_e.pdf to http://www.pc.gc.ca/lhn-nhs/on/plan/pd-mp_KingFortifications_e.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:44, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]