Talk:Forrest Tucker

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers / Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

United States: Indiana Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Indiana portal This article is supported by WikiProject Indiana (assessed as Low-importance).

Improvements to article

The lede is supposed to want you to read on and give a overview. The account of how he got started is referenced. The stories about his, well you know,are part of what makes him notable and there are abundant reverences.Overagainst (talk) 09:17, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see you've re-added your contributions that I had reverted, this time putting in some references. However, you still have material that is unsourced or unreliably sourced; reads like a review; and contains effusive language such as puffery and editorializing. According to MOS:LEAD, "Consideration should be given to creating interest in reading more of the article, but the lead should not 'tease' the reader by hinting at content that follows. Instead, the lead should be written in a clear, accessible style with a neutral point of view; it should ideally contain no more than four well-composed paragraphs and be carefully sourced as appropriate." Also, while I am certainly not suggesting information be censored, I find it hard to see how a fixation on Tucker's penis size is notable or particularly relevant compared to his body of work in films, television, and stage. It would be different of he were a pornographic film actor, where his penis would be featured. Why don't you think about the remarks I've made here, read some of the guidelines I've linked, and see if you can improve your additions with more complete references and encyclopedic style. --hulmem (talk) 01:59, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tucker was well-known in his day for his ginormous schlong. Seems relevant to me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.166.163.235 (talk) 19:47, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]