Talk:Forrest Gump/GA1
GA Review
[edit]I nominated the article at GAN after expanding the article. If you have not significantly contributed to the article, consider reviewing it at WP:GAN. Good job to everyone that has contributed to the article in the past and hopefully it passes. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 02:10, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
The article looks great, great work to all who were involved! Nicely sourced, written and great info! Wildroot (talk) 04:33, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
- And it passed, good job everyone. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:54, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
Article Title
[edit]Why is this article at Forrest Gump? Since the book came first, shouldn't this be Forrest Gump (film)? Emperor001 (talk) 04:48, 22 February 2010 (UTC)