Talk:Forrest, Victoria

Australia: Places / Victoria Low‑importance

	Australia portal Forrest, Victoria is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian places (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Victoria (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Victoria.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Cycling: Mountain Biking Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Mountain Biking task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

Hello. Would it be relevant/appropriate to add in that an eco-tours company is based here which operates tours to see platypuses in addition to the local flora and fauna? I've been on the tour and it's excellent - a great way to enlighten visitors and encourage tourism, without damaging the environment. I have a citation source from an official site and they also have their own website. Aussiewriter (talk) 19:29, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It depends largely on what your source is, if it is tourism promotion site, probably not. Added information needs to be sourced from reliable independent third party sources.--Melburnian (talk) 06:39, 30 June 2009 (UTC) =. Melburnian (talk) 06:39, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

the source is the official government site for the region - is that not acceptable?Aussiewriter (talk) 21:25, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's more relevant to the article Great Otway National Park; a mention could be made about Lake Elizabeth and platypuses and that canoe tours are conducted there, but , in my opinion, the company name should not be mentioned. Melburnian (talk) 03:08, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A picture of a platypus might be appropriate then? Aussiewriter (talk) 19:31, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so, unless it was actually taken in Forrest, otherwise it could be a bit misleading. --06:39, 30 June 2009 (UTC)Melburnian (talk)

I'm sorry, I should have clarified - a picture of a platypus from one of the tours provided by the company that runs the tours.Aussiewriter (talk) 21:25, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article it could be used for may depend on where it was taken, but generally speaking we have very few pictures of platypuses in the wild [1], and a good picture uploaded to Wikimedia Commons has a good chance of being used in an article somewhere. Melburnian (talk) 03:08, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Forrest, Victoria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080907091730/http://www.fullpointsfooty.net/forrest.htm to http://www.fullpointsfooty.net/Forrest.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:55, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]