Talk:Former Presidents Act

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Presidents Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject United States Presidents.

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Confused

Wait, it's 191.00 - something? Isn't it 191,000 - something? Very odd. Please check that error Gautam ^Discuss 23:40, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also confused

"an executive department head's salary" is this referring to the President? Can someone reword so it has a clearer meaning. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 14:40, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

They mean the salary of a Cabinet officer, like the Secretary of State (head of the State Department) or the Secretary of Defense (head of the Defense Department). --Metropolitan90 (talk) 22:40, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Former Presidents Act. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090314140658/http://treas.gov:80/usss/history.shtml to http://www.treas.gov/usss/history.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:55, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Secret Service protection for impeached presidents

I removed The provisions in the Former Presidents Act do not revoke an impeached president's right to Secret Service protection or Arlington National Cemetery burial. as unsourced. Don't know whether that's true or not. The Former Presidents Act of 3 U.S.C. § 102 Note says: (f) As used in this section, the term ‘former President’ means a person— ... “(2) whose service in such office shall have terminated other than by removal pursuant to section 4 of article II of the Constitution of the United States of America ... Seems to me that a former president is removed from office, he loses all entitlements. I don't know whether that would also apply to a president whose term ended after he was impeached but before he was tried in the Senate. If found guilty, does the removal take effect retroactively? Space4Time3Continuum2x (talk) 18:11, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Josue

Why is the first topic Josue? 2601:640:8200:9690:7C29:30DD:5C54:E9A3 (talk) 07:24, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for pointing out some vandalism that lingered on far too long. It's been fixed. —C.Fred (talk) 13:10, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]