Talk:Form (computer virus)

Computer Security: Computing High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as High-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Inaccurate Data

Your data is inaccurate. Form could infect hard drives. It ran on startup from computers with infected hard drives. This is how it spread to floppies. I'll give you a few days to correct this. If it's not corrected I'll fix it myself. (Yes there are also other errors.) (Corrected a few - as mistake Form doesn't infect hard drives which it of course did spectacularly.)

One Must Wonder

I've been reading the history of this article. In particular I noted someone who made a change and wrote 'I have some experience with this virus. It does not encrypt its message.' Well of course it didn't encrypt it! But now I have to wonder: why would anyone write that it had? My only conclusion is that people are writing things here with an ambition they can't cash. What is Wikipedia - an encyclopaedia or a scribble board?

Plagiarism?

I note great sections of this article seem to have been taken from the (incorrect) F-Secure treatise on the subject. Whoever did this took out the sections he/she couldn't understand but otherwise left the text intact. As such I have to accuse the article of being plagiarism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.217.144.160 (talk) 06:04, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Broken Link

The link for CIAC is broken.Douira100 (talk) 13:19, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]