Talk:Forgive Me If I've Told You This Before

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

Oregon Low‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

Children's literature Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks you can do:

Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks.

Add {{Portal|Children's literature}} to the See also section of related articles.
Tag the talk pages of related articles with {{WikiProject Children's literature}}
Join WikiProject Children's literature and list yourself as a Participant in the project.
Cleanup: A cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.
Deletion discussions: listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature
Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
Rate the Unassessed articles in the Children's literature WikiProject.
References: Add references to Unreferenced BLPs.
Requested articles: Create a requested article on literature
Stubs: Improve a stub-class article

edit

I thought the lead section of the article was very detailed and provided a good insight into the creation of the book. I thought the article’s structure was very clear and easy to read through and find the proper information that was needed. I thought the content covered many areas of this topic and does its job very well.

Agreed. I think the plot section could use some re-writing. I'm also wondering if Triinu's "newfound appreciation towards women" is an euphemism, and could be clearer? -- Sandbergja (talk) 04:13, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article itself was very detailed and specific. the summary left no questions. I would have been less confused if there was a subheading about measure 9, or just a link to something to explain? other than that, it was detailed and held more information on important subjects. Green dragon cries (talk) 16:41, 1 March 2021 (UTC) Green dragon cries[reply]

I thought the lead section of the article was clear, easy to understand, and detailed. The article's structure made sense for was it was about, and was pretty straightforward. I also thought the article also cited as many reliable sources as possible, given the nature of the article. Calmbeav (talk) 23:07, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]