Talk:Forest Lawn Cemetery (Cathedral City)

California: Inland Empire Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Inland Empire task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Death Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cemeteries Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cemeteries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cemeteries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CemeteriesWikipedia:WikiProject CemeteriesTemplate:WikiProject CemeteriesCemeteries articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 20 April 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved - Consensus is that when the city name alone is sufficient to disambiguate, no additional information is needed. (non-admin closure) В²C ☎ 04:59, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

– These articles' names should follow the naming of the location they're in. HandsomeFella (talk) 21:28, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - sufficiently disambiguated per WP:NCGEO while remaining WP:CONCISE as possible. See Main Street (disambiguation) for several examples of using (City) not (City, State). -- Netoholic @ 02:19, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, there are no examples in the Main Street link you provided that support your view. (Note: Some of the articles have been moved since the dab page was last updated, so I have edited it to reflect that.) For instance, Main Street in Kansas City, Missouri, is at Main Street (Kansas City, Missouri), without there being an article on Main Street (Kansas City, Kansas). Main Street (Kansas City) is a redirect to Main Street (Kansas City, Missouri), created from a move more than six years ago, citing WP:USPLACE.
Sure, Main Street in Los Angeles is at Main Street (Los Angeles), but that's because Los Angeles is undabbed. In fact, for every Main Street there with only a city dab, the city article itself is undabbed.

Also, it isn't very logical considering the following theoretical example. There are several cities named Portland in the U.S. Let's pretend that only one of them has a (notable) street named Main Street. Should the article on that street be named Main Street (Portland) only then? Which Portland? If the cities need a state dab, I'm sure you agree that the Main Street article would need a city-state-dab.

HandsomeFella (talk) 06:47, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

*Oppose. We don't need this. If a person wants to know about Forest Lawn in Long Beach, California, it is pretty obvious at present to type out the query without adding the state. There is no Forest Lawn in Long Beach, New York. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 17:22, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is no article on Main Street in Kansas City, Kansas, either. Yet the article Main Street (Kansas City, Missouri) is where it is. HandsomeFella (talk) 19:29, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per all the above. 111.68.115.165 (talk) 03:57, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.