This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Finland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FinlandWikipedia:WikiProject FinlandTemplate:WikiProject FinlandFinland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
"To secure their realm, the Swedish kings, notably Gustav Vasa (r. 1528-60) and Eric XIV (r. 1561-8), encouraged farmers to settle these vast wilderness regions, which in turn were used to the traditionally slash-and-burn agriculture."
"[...] settled to c. 150 counties of Sweden Proper and to Norway". The English word County is usually translated into "län" in Swedish and "fylke" in Norway. There are no where near that many counties (län/fylken) in Sweden and Norway combined. I am guessing that the number refers to parishes. Could someone clarify this? User:Sjöberg1977—Preceding undated comment added 11:16, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
There is no such thing as a flag of the Forest Finns. The Forest Finns never had any flag, and there was no Forest Finnish country either. The flag that a certain user apparently tries to insert into the top of the article, against the opposition of several people as it turns out, has nothing to do with the topic of the article, viz., the historical ethno-linguistic group called the Forest Finns, but is a pure and ahistorical invention used by a modern Norwegian festival, and as has been pointed out, not even commonly associated with the Forest Finns. Being myself of Forest Finnish descent, I can say with certainty that this flag has absolutely nothing to do with my Forest Finnish ancestors who lived in Sweden. Illustrations should be relevant to the topic of the article, not promote some obscure modern festival's logo and nonsensical idea about a Forest Finnish "republic". Nil Torquan (talk) 20:21, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The norwegian newspaper article from 2008 shows people in Finnskog (in english literally 'finnforest') proclaiming the "Republikken Finnskogen" for 39. time. But as they are folklore pseudo-rebels there are no will to control the territory militarily. This is not a norwegian Transnistria, this is a minority celebrating their finnish roots. The Sami people keep their own flag. This could be a similar attempt to flag a minority identity within a (or several) national state. I would not use the flag without better sources. This museum might know something.Andrez1 (talk) 02:02, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Highlights of Research on Forest Finns.pdf points to ″C.A. Gottlund's political rally and his petition to the king signed by twelve Forest Finn activists from Värmland and Solør. They pleaded for an autonomous district and three Finnish parishes, which were to be situated on both sides of the Swedish-Norwegian border." Grue, Finnskog, where the festival is held is in the Solør area. So there is an old (1823?) attempt on autonomy. The article on Carl_Axel_Gottlund states "Gottlund began pursuing the creation of an autonomous Finnish county called Fennia." If the flag in question is linked to that, i dont know.Andrez1 (talk) 14:07, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
As far as I know, the flag is a modern invention, used by a festival in Norway since the 70s or 80s. Thus, using it as the primary illustration gives an undue weight to that Norwegian festival, and is ahistorical because the flag wasn't used by the ethno-linguistic group when the group existed as such. When discussing Forest Finns as a "minority", it is important to consider the fact that there are no living person who really belongs to this minority in any other capacity than by partial and distant ancestry, and without actually being brought up in the Forest Finnish culture and without speaking their language. The vast majority of Forest Finns had become assimilated Scandinavians by 1800 (at the time Gottlund was born), and all their descendants have intermarried extensively with Scandinavians for at least 300 years. For example, every living person in Norway has probably Roman ancestry 2,000 years ago, but that doesn't make them Romans in the sense that we ought to have an illustration of a modern Norwegian guy at the top of the article on the Romans. Nil Torquan (talk) 08:25, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Also note that Carl Axel Gottlund wasn't a Forest Finn. The Forest Finns were an ethnic group that split from the Finns in the 16th and 17th centuries, much like the Afrikaners split from the Dutch. While they are related, they are also separate groups a few centuries later. I think it would have been rather counterproductive for him to make a flag on behalf of the Forest Finns, mimicking the national flags, if he wanted the King to give them some sort of semi-autonomy (from a vexillological perspective, the flag also seems likely to have been created in the 20th century). There wasn't any movement for autonomy among the (almost entirely Scandinavianized) descendants of the Forest Finns themselves in the 19th century. Nil Torquan (talk) 08:30, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I do not advocate use of the flag as the flag of the Forest Finns. But the disputed flag ((disputed) Flag of the Forest Finns) is interesting. (Way to Green, probably wrong proporsjons, and Category:Flags_of_ethnic_groups is only maybe.) Still there is a contemporary use and a history untold. --Andrez1 (talk) 21:33, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This points at Åsta Holt as the source of the Flag. «Forfatteren Åsta Holth (av slekten Lehmoinen) utviklet i protest republikken Finnskogen for snart 40 år siden, med et eget langsmalt svart og grønt korsflagg, egen regjering og egen bonad.» (= The Author Åsta Holt (family Lehmoinen) developed in protest the Republic Finnforest for almost 40 years ago (2008) whith a long an narrow black and green crossflag, own goverment and bonad. --Andrez1 (talk) 22:03, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I am of Forest Finnish descent and I have never heard of anyone alive today who "is" a Forest Finn in the sense that is used in this article (or any other articles on peoples). Of course I and other descendants of the Forest Finns identify as persons of (partial) Forest Finnish ancestry, but it would be silly to claim to "be a Forest Finn" (i.e. as one's primary identity) in the way most people in Norway are Norwegians, when no living person speaks the Forest Finnish language and when most descendants of the Forest Finns have been assimilated Scandinavians for centuries, and when all descendants of the Forest Finns have more Swedish/Norwegian ancestry than Finnish. We Scandinavans are also descendend from numerous other peoples like the Wends, but it would certainly be ahistorical and silly to claim that someone living today "is a Wend" (i.e. as their primary identity, as opposed to: has (distant) Wendish ancestry). Nil Torquan (talk) 01:39, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified 2 external links on Forest Finns. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Forest Finns still exist according to themself, the Norwegian state and the Swedish states. They are recognized as a living national minority according to multiply international declarations.
First off, I recommend looking at the Wikipedia pages of the countries where this minorty lives, and see how they are referred to. Additionally you should also that a look at the judicial status of the Forest Finns in Norway. Ask if you need guidence. It's better than threatening to ban people who correct you, @TylerBurden. Madstarrr (talk) 16:55, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It would be helpful if you could provide the references to support this claim, I am not threatening you, I notified you of the edit warring policy which you were breaching by not following WP:BRD. TylerBurden (talk) 16:57, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
From the parliamentary decree/announcements on the legal framework for the policy towards national minorities:
Definition of the group in Norwegian: Skogfinner are descendants of Finnish immigrants who came to Norway from the early 17th century and settled in forest areas in Eastern Norway, mainly along the Swedish border. Today, some forest Finns have a strong cultural affinity with forest Finnish, while others feel that the differences between Norwegian and forest Finnish are relatively blurred. Finnskogen is a large continuous forest area that stretches along both sides of the national border between Solør in Norway and Värmland in Sweden.
... and English: Skogfinner ARE descendants of Finnish immigrants who came to Norway from the early 17th century and settled in forest areas in Eastern Norway, mainly along the Swedish border. Today, some Forest Finns have a strong cultural affinity with Forest Finnish, while others feel that the differences between Norwegian and forest Finnish are relatively blurred. Finnskogen is a large continuous forest area that stretches along both sides of the national border between Solør in Norway and Värmland in Sweden.
That they are considered a national minority was already on the article before, but I added the reference to support it as well as including the mention of modern descendants. TylerBurden (talk) 18:17, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
