Jump to content

Talk:Foreign relations of India/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Missing citations

This article is missing citations. Unfortunately I know very little about this topic myself but the Unreferenced tag will be a good start. Khandes3 08:08, 7 July 2006 (UTC)


It might be missing citations, but it's fairly accurate. But it would be better if the article was more in depth. Like how relations changed during BJP rule or Gujrals time etc etc. 138.88.72.19 17:45, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Substantial work required here

A lot of work is required in expanding India's foreign policy, relations, history and its scope, and range, of dealings with various countries.

I've cleaned up a large part of the article. But much more work is required. - Tigger69 August 17 2005

I'm planning on extending this remarkably and how each party feels about the other nations. Any help is appreciated.--Milki 19:02, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

B-class article

There are a lot of gaps in the article. For example, the article doesn't say much regarding India's policies during the cold war era and its role in NAM. Too much info is given on relationship w/ Tajikistan but not much is available for relationship w/ erstwhile Soviet Union. Also, where are the sources? --Incman|वार्ता 06:09, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Indo-Russian Relation

Indo-Soviet relation is covered very inadequately in this article given the kind of cooperation between India and USSR (later successor country Russia) over last 50-60 years. --apurv1980 16:53, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Introduction POV

"is considered as a major power and a potential superpower. It is India's growing international influence that gives it a prominent voice in global affairs."

Putting "is considered" in front of a subjective, un cited statement does not relieve one of NPOV responsibilities....... Epeeist smudge 13:56, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Brief History contradiction

"In 1962, India detected Chinese infiltration into Indian territory, which resulted in a brief war between the two. India has remained suspicious towards China since then. China also became a close ally of Pakistan, India's neighbor, adding to the rift between the two. Even though, there has been a significant improvement in trade and diplomatic relations, India remains wary of China."

The quoted paragraph is in direct contradiction with the wiki article on the 1962 Sino-Indian War. The Henderson-Brooks Report itself cites that it was Indian aggression and encroachment of Chinese sovereign territory that sparked the war. (Psychoneko 01:51, 10 April 2007 (UTC))

Arrogant foreign policy

I question the POV of this statement with regards to the apparent 'arrogance' of Indian foreign policy being a potential barrier to gaining a permanent UN security seat. 172.143.187.185 21:28, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

look east policy?

i really think someone has to start asserting topics bout look east policy. No one has, hasnt it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.5.16.228 (talk) 04:33, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Cites

The second half of this article lacks cites.

Hdgcfcf (talk) 19:26, 24 November 2007 (UTC)--

India escapes U.S. list of worst human traffickers

Thought this might be worthy of inclusion [1]

How is it noteworthy when India DIDN'T make the list? Also please sign your comments with ~~~~ Vishnuchakra 05:59, 15 July 2007 (UTC)


India's a country of a billion people. Child trafficking numbers may be large, but when compared with our population, the percentage is much smaller than the percents of other traffickers. Hdgcfcf (talk) 19:30, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

arch rivals?

first of all, what are "arch rivals?" makes it sound more like a cheesy western rather than international politics...

second, are there any "arch rivals" even shown on the map? I'm removing the term, unless anyone has any objections 70.231.159.158 (talk) 05:38, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Opposition of Israel

I suspect it to be vandalism, but if someone has a valid source supporting Mahatma Gandhi's "opposition to the creation of Israel", please present it here... However I highly doubt one will be found. Sumit Desai 02:37, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
He was opposed to the creation of Israel on just Palestinian lands only since he believed "that the Palestine of biblical times was not a geographic tract".He also believed that Jews must peacefully agitate for their rights. Here is a link documenting the publication of a book in this regard.

[2]. Here is the link to the reproduced editorial from the Harijan Newspaper of 11 November 1938. [3]Abhishekmathur (talk) 18:00, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

The image Image:BrahMos.gif is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --22:44, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Restructured

I thought restructuring is needed and I restructured the whole article.I expanded it to include some other countries and UNO,SAARC.It still needs to expand to include south africa, individual african countries, australia etc Also this article has to expanded with India's official status with the countries.I want some help to do it.Don't crop the article.Foreign relations article should be generally a considerably longer. Vijay Sai (talk) 14:33, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Separate foreign policy of India

I think foreign relations of India article has gone large, so I think Foreign policy of India should be separated from the article. Vijay Sai (talk) 06:20, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Foreign Policy

The section about foreign policy needs to be explained properly. There is a unique isolationist trend in India's foreign policy not found in any other countries foreign policy. It is based on not aligning itself with any power group for the sake of establishing "peace". Examples include India not taking membership of any defence organizations (like Pakistan did for CENTO), not trying to play a role in Palestine etc. If someone (who can access this article or any other good source) elaborates the section, then it would definitely present a more clear picture of India's policy.--Shahab (talk) 09:45, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Soft power

No mention here of India's soft power that has helped to build plenty of relations with the world? Namely, Africa, E. Europe, S.E.Asia, and C. Asia. Its on the indian embassy bombing page. Lihaas (talk) 22:27, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Bot report : Found duplicate references !

In the last revision I edited, I found duplicate named references, i.e. references sharing the same name, but not having the same content. Please check them, as I am not able to fix them automatically :)

  • "FICCI" :
    • [http://www.ficci.com/international/countries/korea/koreacommercialrelation.htm FICCI info]
    • [http://www.ficci.com/international/countries/iraq/iraqcommercialrelation.htm Iraq Economic and Commercial Relations]
  • "VO" :
    • [http://www.financialexpress.com/old/fe_full_story.php?content_id=42065 Realism in India-Myanmar relations]
    • {{cite web |title=India, Vietnam sign MoU for bilateral cooperation on security |url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/News/Economy/India_Vietnam_sign_MoU_for_bilateral_cooperation_on_security/articleshow/2895191.cms |date=2008-03-24 |publisher=[[Times of India]] |accessdate=2008-06-16}}

DumZiBoT (talk) 18:02, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Puff piece

The article reads like a puff piece about India rather than as an encylopedia article analyzing its foreign relations objectively. It relies too much on opinion pieces as sources. Deleting the opening paragraph and weeding out some of the peacock terms would improve the tone. 89.243.212.46 (talk) 21:18, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Split article

This article is getting rather long and tedious. the sheer size can put off many. Perhaps it can be split taking out the some regions into a generic "bilateral relations" page. Something along the lines of Foreign policy of Hugo Chavez off from the Hugo Chavez page. Lihaas (talk) 13:08, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Foreign relations of India with European Union and Latin America

hi,it would be useful if we have a separate article on Foreign relations of India with European Union and Latin America nag97 (talk) 08:04, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Missing Diplomatic Relations

In the map of countries having formal diplomatic relations with India, several notable countries are missing examples include but not limited to:

  • Uruguay, Paraguay, Ecuador [4]
  • Estonia [5], Lithuania, Lativia, Belgium, Croatia, Iceland [6]. Several Provinces of the UK like the Channel Islands, Gibraltar, Falkland Islands etc which should be covered by the British Embassy. Similarly Greenland is covered by Denmark as it only has home rule.
  • Djibouti [7], Benin, Liberia —Preceding unsigned comment added by Abhishekmathur (talk • contribs) 06:31, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Countries listed above are added in the map. Please check for discrepancies.Sainath (talk) 03:30, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Which Side During the Cold War?

It says in the relations with Germany sections that India was on the side of East Germany not West Germany. However was it not on either side as it is part of the non-aligned movement. Should this be removed. Lemonade100 (talk) 17:21, 26 March 2009 (GMT)

Proposed WikiProject - Bilateral relations

There is now a upstart WikiProject to establish a concensus about WP's International bilateral relations articles, including "X-Y (country) relations" articles, at Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/Bilateral international relations. Interested parties should add their names at Wikipedia:WikiProject International relations/Bilateral relations task force if they wish to play a part in the discussions or have an Interest in this going forward. Thank you for your attention. CaribDigita (talk) 23:15, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

This article includes content merged from articles listed at Talk:Foreign relations of India/Merged content. Aymatth2 (talk) 12:23, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Tripura and Bangladesh

In the international dispute section its given that Bangladesh disputes the status of Tripura and considers it as a part of the "Chittagonian plains of Bangladesh".

The statement is blatantly false. Whoever wrote this should really have given a reference and I doubt anyone can even find any reference because this is a pure and simple lie.

Bangladesh has NEVER staked any claim on Tripura and there is absolutuely no dispute over the status of Tripura between India and Bangladesh. Plus as a Bangladeshi and an avid follower of south asian politics, I have never heard of Bangladeshis even ever thinking of laying claim on Tripura. So i have removed that sentence.

The only relation Bangladesh has with Tripura is the presence of a 100,000 strong Tripura tribe in the Chittagong Hill Tracts.--ChaudhryAzan (talk) 14:39, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Style issue

First few lines of the second paragraph sound amateurish, and perhaps also have citaion issues

SPat (talk) 13:01, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Foreign relations of India/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: --Sharadbob (talk) 12:37, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Citing

Some of the references that are listed in the article need to be formatted using citation templates, such as {{cite web}} or {{cite news}}, although majority of them ate already done with but a few aren't.I'd also recommend for appropriate titles for references 174 to 180.--Sharadbob (talk) 12:37, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Quickfailed

The current review seems to abandoned, so I stepped in

Indo-Malaysia relations

On 20th Jan,2010,Malaysian PM visited India & had signed many pacts...Please include that article in it & pls do the needful changes in it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DeadRed94 (talk • contribs) 14:21, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Azad Kashmir and UNO

Azad Kashmir having separate President and Prime Minister is independent State.
Is there any separate constitution for Jammu, Kashmir and Ladakh? vkvora 09:23, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
In International law, what is important is De Facto status and not De Jure status. Does Azad Kashmir have accredited diplomats to other countries and passports accepted by any country? --- Skapur 19:56, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
Is there any reservation of seats in Indian Univercity for Azad Kashmir? vkvora 11:59, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
Yes. But the person would have to renounce all other citizenships and be accepted as an Indian citizen. University reservations in India are limited to Indian citizens. --- Skapur 14:19, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
To Skapur : Any person who accept citizenship of India from Azad Kashmir means there is no LOC between Azad Kashmir and India. vkvora 15:38, 28 August 2006 (UTC)


Nationals of AJK travel on Pakistan passports, marked with citizen of AJK. Diplomats are standard Pakistani. Co-ordination between Islamabad and Muzaffarabad is through Ministry of Kashmir and Northern Areas (now renamed Gilgit-Baltistan) Kslall8765 (talk) 07:57, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Indo-Cuba relations

Please give suggestion whether this article should be included in this topic. I came across this pdf file in the MEA website http://meaindia.nic.in/meaxpsite/foreignrelation/10fr01.pdf Yohannvt (talk) 09:33, 12th August 2011 (UTC)

Description of the photo

The description of one of the photo says. "Former Indian PM Nehru with then Pakistani PM Muhammad Ali Bogra in 195." I think the year 195 is to be corrected. Achyuth — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.45.7.162 (talk) 10:18, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

>> Indian sex attacks spark foreign warnings[8](Lihaas (talk) 14:29, 18 January 2014 (UTC)).

Sources

I undid what Madhavi456 had changed there was clealy nothing factual about his change , there were no sources, so after eximaning what was written i have concluded it was all opinionized there for it is nothing that sould be on the page03:29, 17 January 2008 (UTC)03:29, 17 January 2008 (UTC)03:29, 17 January 2008 (UTC)03:29, 17 January 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mandeep 619 (talk • contribs)

The listing of key allies of India looks highly suspect. How come neither Pakistan, Bangladesh or China are considered rivals? How come Kyrgyzstan is a key partner?

Pakistan is marked as an arch-rival in the map while Bangladesh and China are marked as countries with whom India has major territorial disputes. And the country marked as dark green is Tajikistan, not Kyrgyzstan. --128.210.124.67 15:00, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
see Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline, india is looking to increase its presence in central asia to counter the chinese and to tap into it's resources. Moreover, i am not sure of this, but i think india and tajikistan declared each other strategic partners in a joint press statement related to the TAPI — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rishab1996 (talk • contribs) 13:12, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 24 external links on Foreign relations of India. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:28, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Foreign policy of Narendra Modi

It would be better if the article is merged here. Rajib56789 (talk) 06:52, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Oppose: No valid rationale is given, also considering the size of Foreign policy of Narendra Modi it is not good option to merge it here. Article is keep on increasing with each foreign visit of Modi. Still his 4 years are remained. --Human3015TALK  13:35, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

International Organisations

The section on Indian participation in International organisation would be more useful and informative if presented in a tabular format with columns for Organisation, Abbreviation, Status, Year participated, etc. Sudhanshu Nimbalkar (talk) 06:07, 6 November 2015 (UTC) Sudhanshu Nimbalkar (talk) 06:07, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 22:15, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Foreign relations of India/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)Press [show] to view →
== B-class article==

There are a lot of gaps in the article. For example, the article doesn't say much regarding India's policies during the cold war era and its role in NAM. Too much info is given on relationship w/ Tajikistan but not much is available for relationship w/ erstwhile Soviet Union. Also, where are the sources? --Incman|वार्ता 06:09, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

== WP:India Assessment == Given the gamut of topics that this article encompasses, it has sections/sub-sections that are either unreferenced or heavily under-referenced. Sections such as Policy, History, certain sub-sections of Bilateral and regional relations and International disputes (which is under-developed) have to be substantiated with reliable and verifiable references. For now, I will just retain it to B-class. Should there be any further questions, please let me know. Mspraveen (talk) 14:05, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Forgot to add: This article has tremendous potential to be nominated for higher rating classes once the above is resolved. Great work till now. Mspraveen (talk) 14:18, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Last edited at 14:18, 1 July 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 14:48, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Foreign relations of India. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:30, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

how to upload this image on india-nicaragua relations page

i need to insert this image (File:India nicaragua locator.png) on the page India-Nicaragua relations. Could anyone help me out with this upload. the image file is located on en.wikipedia. Sufyanxtreme (talk) 20:28, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Foreign relations of India. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:13, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 30 external links on Foreign relations of India. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:11, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 26 external links on Foreign relations of India. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:03, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 20 external links on Foreign relations of India. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:49, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Foreign relations of India. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:36, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Boldface for "Ministry of External Affairs (India)"?

Why is "Ministry of External Affairs (India)" in bold in the first sentence? It is not the title of the article. Nurg (talk) 10:41, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:32, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

No Update of article in lieu of reflecting recent events

It has been noticed that this article is not viewing current situations related to the bilateral relations between India and other counties. I add new and recent and current situations with counties, example, with China, Pakistan, Turkey, and even Malaysia, with my most effort citations. I urge the authorities to take immediate action, and update article. Thank You. Utkarsh555 (talk) 07:29, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

D10, Vaccine Maitri, Covid help, Raisina Dialogue

Can we add new topics like Formation of D10 (extension of G7, though not official) Vaccine Diplomacy Covid relief by countries Raisina Dialogue Asmitghosh3 (talk) 02:58, 16 May 2021 (UTC)Asmitghosh3

I think we really need to tell the concerned authorities, as it is observed that this article won't update till anyone takes this painstaking job of updating the article.
Well, probably we should complain it to wikipedia or urge the ministry. Utkarsh555 (talk) 11:48, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Addition of Photos is not updating the to current scenarios. I request editors to keep note on how to edit a page correctly with relevant pictures. Photos of current PM with world leaders do showcase relationship but it is all but formalities. I request for addition of information like Indians living in the countries, Students studying as well as security provided. Please add photos of people living their and make the page more dynamic than just a mere photo gallery of PM's photoshoots. About addition please focus on adding content than photos.Asmitghosh3 (talk) 17:14, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
Exactly. Utkarsh555 (talk) 09:01, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 1 October 2021

Former Afghanistan was our ally but current Afghanistan is under Taliban influence 157.38.3.140 (talk) 08:24, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:11, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Flags removed

I don't see any sense in removing the flag icons of the countries from the article. I recommend reverting it back. Utkarsh555 (talk) 03:47, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Brainless editors

Where is neutrality in this article? Nepalese territories are said to be Indian. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2400:1A00:BB20:9E64:5C42:B5FD:F74E:6820 (talk) 14:12, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 7 June 2022

Please change the Foreign Secretary of India from Harsh Vardhan Shringla to Vinay Mohan Kwatra. Harsh Vardhan Shringla has retired. [1] Hedgehog7890 (talk) 17:50, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_Secretary_(India)
 Done ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:59, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 13 January 2023

Change ‘israel’ to Palestine 217.165.30.74 (talk) 05:55, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Where? There are numerous instances of the word "Israel" in this article, which are you requesting be changed? Cannolis (talk) 06:44, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

On the title of Henry Kissinger

In the section on India’s relationship with the US, in the paragraph describing the 1971 Indo-Pakistani War, Henry Kissinger is referred to as Secretary of State. This is incorrect. Kissinger would not become Secretary of State until 1973. In 1971, Kissinger was National Security Advisor while William Rogers was still Secretary of State. Kissinger however was still massively more influential on foreign policy due to President Nixon’s distrust of the State Department. 216.15.23.117 (talk) 04:11, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Position of strength with African Union

In the section of AU-India relations, the last line says that, "These relations have created a position of strength with African nations that other nations may not possess." However, the source doesn't look like it makes this claim in any manner and only talks about the relations improving. While the line isn't stated as an outright fact, I think it should be removed since it seems like speculation, not from an external source, but from the article itself.

Additionally, I think the section needs a warning for lack of sources. The 2nd paragraph, which forms the bulk of the section, relies on a single non-independent source. Bluejet007 (talk) 12:10, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 28 November 2023

I2U2 - India Israel USA UAE Karthik333king (talk) 09:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Liu1126 (talk) 11:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Foreign_relations_of_India/Archive_1&oldid=1218899434"