Talk:Foreign relations of Bangladesh

This article is written in Bangladeshi English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analyse, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Bangladesh Top‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh articles

Top

This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Bangladesh To-do list:

Add more images to Bangladesh Liberation War and related pages
Clean up Climate change in Bangladesh, it needs a lot of work
Clean up History of Bangladesh after independence, it needs NPOV
Improve Bangladesh back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengali language back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengalis and related pages
Take a look at the requested articles.
Make a MRT line 3 article.
Extend, add an infobox and a map of New Eskaton to New Eskaton.

Politics Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

International relations Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Section removed

I moved the section 'Pakistan and Bangladesh', which appeared to be a personal essay by User:82.0.149.86.

It started:

"In the context of Islam's journey in the sub-continent a few words about the common factors between Pakistan and Bangladesh would not be out of place here. We cannot overlook the fact that it were the proud people of Pakistan and Bangladesh that welcomed the preachers of Islam and embraced its teachings spontaneously and earnestly in overwhelming numbers, while its success in other parts of the sub-continent was limited."

And continued much in the same vein, based around the point of view that Pakistan and Bangladesh are natural allies. This may or may not be true: it's irrelevant. This was not suitable material for Wikipedia. We might expand the existing bilateral relations section with information about this political movement and the effect it has on the current relations with Pakistan. Morwen - Talk 15:38, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Review

I think this whole article is in need of a review. The massive amount of subsections is unnecessary, given that most of them could be lumped together rather than having their own tiny section (see German relations...). The tone of the India and Pakistand sections is a bit off, too. 89.100.18.51 (talk) 09:55, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Libyan relation

The section says that Lib-Ban relation was non-existent because, among other reasons, Lib gave asylum to Mujib's killers. Yet, the Lib-Ban relation was established in Jan 8, 1975, according to the section. Mujib was assassinated on Aug 15, 1971. How can granting asylum to Mujib's killers be a reason for the no-relation? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ratibgreat (talk • contribs) 04:11, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Foreign relations of Bangladesh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:31, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Foreign relations of Bangladesh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:57, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Foreign relations of Bangladesh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:46, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

বাংলাদেশ নির্বাচন কমিশনের লোগো.svg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:52, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

বাংলাদেশ নির্বাচন কমিশনের লোগো.svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:38, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

I propose to merge Foreign policy of Bangladesh into Foreign relations of Bangladesh. I think it would be appropriate to merge this page as there is very little information on it and it can easily be covered on the target page.—AMomen88 (talk) 04:47, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Don't merge here – a better merge target for the content would be Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Bangladesh). --Worldbruce (talk) 18:25, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@AMomen88 I strictly oppose the merge proposal. Listen, Even India has two separate articles, and not just India, Any country you name it. Their foreign relations and foreign policy are described in brief, and merging would only lengthened the article. Better abandon this proposal. Utkarsh555 03:24, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Utkarsh555 Thank you for your insight. I have just checked, no such article exists entitled Foreign policy of India (the article is a redirect to Foreign relations of India). The "foreign policy of India" is covered by the article Foreign relations of India which is the equivalent to what I am proposing to merge this article with. Upon conducting research I have ascertained that your assumption that "any country" has a similar article is also incorrect. This article is very short and merging would not present any major problems in regards to brevity. Kind regardsAMomen88 (talk) 17:30, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@AMomen88 Ok well. looks like you got a point here. Well yes, if it is in within the Wikipedia standards, then you may. thanks, and have a nice day! Utkarsh555 03:06, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Given the consensus to follow the structure used in other similar cases,

Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 09:37, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]