Talk:Ford F-Series (thirteenth generation)

Automobiles Mid‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trucks Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trucks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of trucks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TrucksWikipedia:WikiProject TrucksTemplate:WikiProject TrucksTrucks articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

What does it weigh?

This article includes many length/width/height measurements of the various configurations, and a lot of talk about weight-saving tech... but it does not mention its actual weight. 68.246.216.99 (talk) 04:21, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ford F-Series (thirteenth generation). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20140918075359/http://fontainedesignworks.wordpress.com/resume/ to http://fontainedesignworks.wordpress.com/resume/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:48, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Ford F-Series which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 02:15, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ford Atlas Concept (2013)

Look, it is becoming very obvious that another user keeps deliberately adding text, that gives a misleading impression, where the P552 body design was derived from the 2013 Atlas Concept, shown at the 2013 NAIAS. I have said countless times, that this is inaccurate. By nature of the required lead times for a production model program and that of the P552, a concept car takes much less time and money to develop at under 1 year versus 5 years and $1-2 million vs $1-2 billion. If this keeps being re-added by the same person, over and over, action will be taken to protect the article against what may be considered vandalism.
Seeing the debut of a concept car in public first, doesn't mean that it automatically was created/developed first before anything else related to it. Nor does it mean that's where a respective automaker is at that point in time, regarding development. It is a marketing statement to the media and public, simple as that about "what we're going to do in the future". Making this assumption of (not designed yet or finalized) automatically and then using it as the basis for your editing contributions, is not only misleading, but careless. As someone connected to Ford to a degree, I don't see any reason to put misinformation in Ford articles, just because it suits a personal viewpoint and isn't reality.
The P552 final design was approved in December 2011, on the basis of a fullsize clay mockup chosen by Alan Mulally, J Mays, Gordon Platto, Ford family members and the rest of the board and senior management. This is privileged information, but factual. Therefore, I'm not going to accept anything that contradicts that, because clearly it would be false information and doesn't need to be in the article, creating a false narrative. The Atlas was solely a 2012 creation, which paralleled freezing of the P552 final body design. You have final appearance approval (FAA) and then final data adjustment model (FDJ), which the former is a production body in final shape as a painted clay model. The latter is the production vehicle in 1:1 clay or fiberglass for all intents and purposes, with actual parts (lights, etc) on it. You cannot just assume because you saw the concept in January 2013, then assume that P552 team members had not developed the same final design, you saw in 2014 as the 2015 F-150. Surely Guiletheme can relate to this dilemma.--Carmaker1 (talk) 00:29, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]