Talk:Ford Falcon (BA)/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

This review is part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force/Sweeps, a project devoted to re-reviewing Good Articles listed before August 26, 2007.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

   The introduction is a little short, but considering the overall quality of the article I'm not going to let this minor issue hold it back.

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   I'm surprised this article has maintained its quality over the last two years. Links checked out ok and there are plenty of citations. Prose is of a high quality, and MOS compliance exceeds GA standards. Article kept. --ErgoSum•talk•trib 23:15, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the review some things to work on maybe Senators^{Talk | Contribs} 01:30, 27 July 2009 (UTC)