Talk:Ford Falcon (BA)

Ford Falcon (BA) was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 14, 2006	Good article nominee	Not listed
December 30, 2006	Peer review	Reviewed
January 17, 2007	Good article nominee	Not listed
June 18, 2007	Good article nominee	Listed
June 19, 2009	Good article reassessment	Kept
January 23, 2024	Good article reassessment	Delisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Automobiles Low‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is a selected article at the Cars Portal.

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Ford Falcon (BA) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Archives

Archive 1

Auto Headlights off

The Auto Headlights off didn't become standard until later - perhaps the MkII, but most likely the BF. In fact the reference is to an article that talks about the BF in 2006.

I have a BA XR8 that did not come with auto-headlights.

Luke —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.59.18.155 (talk) 08:44, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i have a BA mkI xr6 turbo with the auto headlights. They came with the lux pack —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.90.70.111 (talk) 10:19, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have a 2003 BA Fairmont that has auto headlights factory fitted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.216.49.250 (talk) 23:01, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Ford BA Falcon/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

This review is part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force/Sweeps, a project devoted to re-reviewing Good Articles listed before August 26, 2007.

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance:
The introduction is a little short, but considering the overall quality of the article I'm not going to let this minor issue hold it back.
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
I'm surprised this article has maintained its quality over the last two years. Links checked out ok and there are plenty of citations. Prose is of a high quality, and MOS compliance exceeds GA standards. Article kept. --ErgoSum•talk•trib 23:15, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review some things to work on maybe Senators^{Talk | Contribs} 01:30, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GAR

Wow, that is one poor quality GAR. Still, I didn't continue to watch it after the first positive seeming review, so that's my fault. Greglocock (talk) 02:33, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]