Talk:Foramen spinosum/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sahara4u (talk · contribs) 03:27, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Comments

•  Done Lead section may be expanded a little. Usually, a paragraph of more than three line ts recommended, merge the two para.

Fleshed out.--LT910001 (talk) 04:38, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

•  Not done History section should come before Structure.

Thanks, the relevant guideline for this article is WP:MEDMOS#Anatomy. For Anatomy articles and medicine-related articles in general, history is recommended as coming after structure.--LT910001 (talk) 04:38, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

•  Done Images need alt text.

Thanks for pointing this out, alternate text is a great way to make articles more accessible that I previously wasn't aware of. I'm not sure if my browser is able to view them, so if I haven't done it correctly please let me know.--LT910001 (talk) 04:38, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

•  Done Place "Additional images" before References

Done, and removed one image. --LT910001 (talk) 04:38, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

—Zia Khan 03:34, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your comments and taking up this review, I hope we can work together to get this promoted. --LT910001 (talk) 04:38, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for taking up this review, Sahara4u, I feel I have addressed your concerns. Do you have any additional concerns regarding promotion to GA status? LT910001 (talk) 12:59, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Assessment

GA review (see Wikipedia:Good article criteria and WP:GACN)

1. Well-written.

   a (clear and concise prose which doesn't violate copyright laws, grammar and spelling are correct): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, and fiction:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (well referenced): b (citations to reliable sources): c (Wikipedia:No original research):

3. Broad in its coverage.

   a (covers major aspects): b (well focused):

4. Neutral .

   Fair representation, no bias:

5. Stable.

   No edit wars nor disputed contents:

6. Illustrated appropriately by images.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Conclusion: Good work with the article. Keep it up! —Zia Khan 23:25, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

   Pass/Fail: