Talk:Foothill Technology High School

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

> FTHS received the score "885"

From what? Meaning please!

Was thinking the same thing. I'm thinking API, but I don't know where to find that info. -- Jjjsixsix ^(t)/_(c) @ 03:46, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On the CST's... --Blue Moon Dragon 02:02, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality defined

This article is nothing short of an advertisement and elitism. Looking through the history, the last good edit was here. Now it's horrible and dominated by what appear to be students and staff members. 66.34.149.108 03:45, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As a Ventura native and someone who works in the school system, I'm here to give some background. Foothill is controversial among some students and parents. It's perceived as attracting the best high school students in the district, siphoning them away from the comprehensive high schools and lowering their test scores. Just after Foothill opened, scores and rankings at both schools dropped (they have since rebounded). That's probably where the charges of "elitism" come from, combined with the perception that Foothill's a "rich kids' school".

That said, this article does need cleanup. szyslak (t, c) 19:17, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Coatsofarmswithdedication2.jpg

Image:Coatsofarmswithdedication2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:23, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Coatsofarmswithdedication2.jpg

Image:Coatsofarmswithdedication2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 08:11, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've addressed the specific image policy concerns (i.e. the rationale didn't specify an article and there was no source information). If anyone feels that's still not good enough, let's discuss. szyslak 18:25, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]