Talk:Foothill Extension

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Trains: Rapid transit Mid‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit (assessed as Mid-importance).

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Foothill Extension.

What should we do about his article?

Now that the foothill extension is opened, are there any regular editor willing to discuss content that should be condensed, deleted, moved to the Gold Line article?--45.51.153.58 (talk) 18:30, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think it makes sense to merge. My hesitation in putting in too much work is that when the Regional Connector project is complete in 2020, Metro staff has proposed to switch the current names to letters for all the rail lines and bus rapid transit lines. Current names for Expo, Gold, Blue will no longer make sense. At that time, the history of each portion can be put into the appropriate article as the current articles will be hard to understand under the new naming system. Fettlemap (talk) 22:07, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gold Line Foothill Extension. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.aia.org/aiaucmp/groups/aia/documents/pdf/aiab082856.pdf
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.foothillextension.org/feir/Resolution%20No%202007-R-01.pdf
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.foothillextension.org/Newsletter_files/newsletter1209_complete.pdf
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.foothillextension.org/PDF/Board%20-%20Cmtes/Construction%20Cmte/2010-05-26%20-%20Construction%20Reports.pdf
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.dbiawp.org/events/2010/DBIA_WP_Mar10_Breakfast_Presentation.pdf
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://foothillextension.org/SEIR/NOP_NOC%20stamped.pdf
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://foothillextension.org/SEIR/SEIR%20Chapter%201_Exec%20Summary.pdf
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://foothillextension.org/SEIR_page.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070403192939/http://foothillextension.org:80/extension.html to http://www.foothillextension.org/extension.html
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.foothillextension.org/PDF/Business/Master%20Cooperative%20Agreement_18mar10.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Much condensing, some material moved to Gold Line article

Hello all!

There's been a "may contain an excessive amount of intricate detail that may only interest a specific audience" template on this one for a while now, and I very strongly agree. In particular, much of the article was taken up with blow-by-blow procedural updates on the bureaucratic and engineering steps to get the extension designed, funded, and approved. With Phase 2A open and Phase 2B approved and soon under construction, a lot of this is no longer of interest or relevant and can be jettisoned in my opinion. If anyone feels I have cut out desperately needed material, I put the most recent version of the article before my edits here, for reference.

I particularly cut down the stuff on Phase 2A, since that's now complete. Some of that material I moved to the relevant section of the main Gold Line article, so please check there before reduplicating that material here.

One of my long-term goals is to assemble History of the Los Angeles Metro Rail and Expansion of the Los Angeles Metro Rail pages (like the History of Bay Area Rapid Transit and Bay Area Rapid Transit expansion pages), which would replace the scattered pages about individual construction projects and get some of the material of mostly historic interest off the pages for individual lines. Until then, though, this page can be a repository for info on the work on the extension that's ongoing. --Jfruh (talk) 22:46, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed changes to structure of Metro Rail/Busway articles

Hi all! I'm planning on changing how Wikipedia covers the history and future of the various Metro lines, moving some material out of the articles for individual lines and to articles specifically about history and expansion. I've put a longish description of my plans and rationale here, if you're interested! --Jfruh (talk) 19:49, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]