Jump to content

Talk:Fool in the Rain

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Led Zeppelin, a UK band, famously, did not release UK singles

[edit]

"In 1980, it was their final song to ever make the pop singles charts, reaching #21."

Um.... where? I mean, I could guess.... TheMadBaron 06:58, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've looked at about 8 top 10-100 lists for 1980 and none even have Led Zeppelin on them. If it is removed, it's on the album article too. --Ortzinator 21:27, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

According to the Inductee timeline from the Rock Hall of Fame, the song indeed charted at #21. -albrozdude 19:24, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

LATIN ROCK ?!!!?!!!

[edit]

I won't make the change myself, yet, but how the hell does this tune qualify as "Latin Rock?" If I'm not mistaken, Latin Rock is performed by Spanish folk (Los Lobos, for example). "Fool In The Rain" barely even sounds Latin! The category of this tune should be changed to simply "Rock," but I'll leave that to discussion first. Its style is that of a rock shuffle, as would be interpreted from the drumming. Jaco66 04:35, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:LZ FoolInTheRain.jpg

[edit]

Image:LZ FoolInTheRain.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:24, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Genesis "version"

[edit]

The bit about "Misunderstanding" needs a source I think. In his interview on the SACD of Genesis's "Duke" album, Collins talks about using Toto's "Hold the Line" as a basis for the song, not this one. To be honest, I can't see much of a connection myself to Fool in the Rain. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cal42 (talk • contribs) 10:40, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The connection is entirely lyrical, not musical. Vonbontee (talk) 15:23, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Surely you're joking!

[edit]

As of 5 Oct 2008, the article on Richard Feynman (6th paragraph under "Personal Life") claims that he was a session musician on this song in 1979 (which conflicts with the late 1978 recording date given here). It's not mentioned in this article and a couple of quick Googles don't show anything. Anybody got a citation for this? 70.185.218.79 (talk) 08:22, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've found this and this, but neither sounds like a reliable source. I think the definitive answer could be found in the booklet of the album, where I expect whoever played percussions on this song to be credited. I am pointing out this discussion to Talk:In Through the Out Door and elsewhere, in the hope that someone who owns the album checks this out. -- Army1987 – Deeds, not words. 20:03, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
As the guy who wrote the first linked article, the Kittysneezes/Classic Feynman review -- I can clarify that I'm not a Reliable Source; in fact, MY source on that was this very same Wikipedia article! - Rev. Syung Myung Me (talk) 04:46, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Latin rock

[edit]

Time to reopen an old discussion. A lot of non-Latin rockers do Latin rock music. There's no reason why it shouldn't say Latin Rock. FMAFan1990 (talk) 22:19, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Heavily studio-based"

[edit]

I think the two sentences after the one regarding the song being "heavily studio-based" is false. John Paul Jones can play piano and bass at the same time. He uses foot bass pedals to achieve that. It is also possible that Jimmy Page could use his double-neck Gibson to play twelve-string and a solo in the song. I believe it would be best to remove those sentences. --Snkcube (talk) 16:38, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Drums recorded seperately?

[edit]

Hey all,

I know there are several takes of John Bonham's master drum tracks floating around the net, but not all of them necessarily indicate that they were used.

For example, the assertion that Bonham recorded the breakdown the breakdown separately goes against one of the takes I found that shows the drum track in its entirety and it seems pretty continuous (no cut) to me. I found it here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14GYov0EdyQ. I also noticed that that assertion about separate takes isn't cited. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.50.207.65 (talk) 02:00, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There's a fairly obvious blip where the second tape comes in during the song. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.21.132.190 (talk) 23:44, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Led Zeppelin Fool in the Rain.ogg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Led Zeppelin Fool in the Rain.ogg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 09:07, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Genre warring

[edit]

Seems to be a lot of genre warring in the revision history, which makes a tough job for the disambiguators. Can someone please double-check the current genre field and apply a reference to it? Thanks! :)  -- WikHead (talk) 00:08, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The genre is currently listed as Rock, proposed changes need to be referenced and consensus reached. FlatOut 11:19, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Meter

[edit]

Time signature-wise, the article is calling it as 4/4 "in the main parts." Sounds more like 12/8 to me. It's at least an eight-count with triplets, to finish out the phrase. O0drogue0o (talk) 14:28, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Fool in the Rain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:13, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Fool in the Rain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:03, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fool in the Rain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:47, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Fool_in_the_Rain&oldid=1210065339"