Talk:Food at the 1964 New York World's Fair
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Food at the 1964 New York World's Fair article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Food at the 1964 New York World's Fair appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 October 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 12:56, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
( )
- ... that sangria was introduced to the United States at the 1964 New York World's Fair? Textbook Of Food & Bevrge Mgmt. McGraw-Hill Education. 2006.
- ALT1:... that Belgian waffles were introduced to the United States at the 1964 New York World's Fair? The Joy of Cooking
Created by Spudlace (talk). Self-nominated at 04:10, 27 September 2020 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: None required. |
Overall: Welcome to DYK! Remember to '''[[link]]''' the nominated article in the hook (and [[link]] other topics that readers may not be familiar with). Note that Sangria should not be included in this nomination because it is not a new qualifying article for DYK purposes. feminist (talk) 13:38, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for reviewing and sorry about linking sangria, it's my first nomination Spudlace (talk) 23:49, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, I came by to promote this but it's not clear why this article was approved with so many paragraphs uncited, per Rule D2. I have tagged the full paragraphs, while all the information in the sections titled "Northern Europe", "The Pacific", "Mediterranean", and "Americas" is completely uncited.
- I have also tagged the last paragraph under Background, which seems to introduce an idea that is never fully explained. Surely there is more in that source to explain it?
- I didn't tag the lead, but more should be added about the notability or legacy of the event.
- There is also close paraphrasing which needs to be rewritten in your own words:
- Source: The Crown Colony Club at the Hong Kong Pavilion featured a menu with hundreds of entrées including shark fin-stuffed dumplings.
- Article: The Crown Colony Club at the Hong Kong Pavilion featured a menu with hundreds of entrées including shark fin-stuffed dumplings.
- Yoninah (talk) 21:50, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
- I don't think any of that is necessary and neither did the previous reviewer. If you don't want to promote it then don't. I certainly don't have to contribute to DYK. If you read the source closely enough to falsely accuse me of close paraphrasing, and misstate what that source says, then you should have also seen that everything you tagged as "citation needed" was taken from that source. There is no rule that everything in the article needs an inline cite to be promoted. Spudlace (talk) 23:13, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
- Rule D2. Yoninah (talk) 00:11, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- For list entries? The paywalled citation was accepted AGF by the first reviewer because it's at Adam Matthew, can someone else with access verify it since there is an objection. Spudlace (talk) 00:38, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- Rule D2. Yoninah (talk) 00:11, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- Apologies, for some reason I missed the uncited paragraphs. Anyway, it appears that the issues have been resolved. feminist (talk) wear a mask, you stupid bastards 03:47, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- Wow, everything looks great now. Thanks, Spudlace! Restoring tick for ALT1 per feminist's review. Yoninah (talk) 12:55, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- I don't think any of that is necessary and neither did the previous reviewer. If you don't want to promote it then don't. I certainly don't have to contribute to DYK. If you read the source closely enough to falsely accuse me of close paraphrasing, and misstate what that source says, then you should have also seen that everything you tagged as "citation needed" was taken from that source. There is no rule that everything in the article needs an inline cite to be promoted. Spudlace (talk) 23:13, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for reviewing and sorry about linking sangria, it's my first nomination Spudlace (talk) 23:49, 29 September 2020 (UTC)