Talk:Foo Fighters/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I feel that, while this article does have a decent amount of development, it would need a very large amount of work before meeting the GA criteria.

The pronouns shift between singular and plural. Singular should be used to correspond with American English usage of singular pronouns in reference to bands.
Sources 1, 2, 6, 8, 10, 11 and 20 should all have page numbers and ISSNs.
Sources 13, 16, 17, 18 and 23 are all bare URLs, and #23 is malformatted.
What makes this site or this reliable? The latter is only two sentences; surely a more substantial source could be used instead.
No critical reception given for any of the albums. What did Allmusic, Entertainment Weekly, Rolling Stone or any other professional reviewers think of the albums?
Large numbers of unsourced statements. I have tagged most of these accordingly.
There were a number of YouTube links and another unreliable source that I weeded out, including this fansite, setlist.fm, which is a wiki, and songfacts.com, which is largely user-submitted.

Reviewer: Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 17:31, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]