Talk:Fontana Records

Jazz Low‑importance

	Jazz portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of jazz on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JazzWikipedia:WikiProject JazzTemplate:WikiProject JazzJazz articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Record Labels

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Record Labels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of record labels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Record LabelsWikipedia:WikiProject Record LabelsTemplate:WikiProject Record Labelsrecord labels articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Fontana Distribution

Fontana is still active as the Fontana Distribution unit of Universal Music Group, still using the classic Fontana logo. Steelbeard1 (talk) 10:39, 10 September 2010 (U==

Fontana's Classical Side

Something needs to be said about how Philips used the Fontana label to issue the best of their older back-catalog classical repertoire. This included the excellent Beethoven cycle by Konwitschny with the Leipzig Gewandhaus, the Handel Organ Concertos with Kohler, various Mozart and Haydn works from Szymon Golberg, Werner Haas's recordings of Chopin and a complete Nozze di Figaro from Karl Boehm and the VSO. Much of this material was so good it has remained in the catalog in other guises - notably re-re-issued on the Berlin Classics Label.82.43.131.168 (talk) 20:35, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

FontanaRecord45Small.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:22, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]