Talk:FontForge

Computing: Software / Free and open-source software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as Low-importance).

Typography High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Typography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Typography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TypographyWikipedia:WikiProject TypographyTemplate:WikiProject TypographyTypography articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Requesting more info

Re: a page on George Williams himself. FontForge is a significant work of real relevance in contemporary technological history. It seems reasonable to expect a significant, persistent legacy from his coding work. It can also be inferred that his typografical work will be permanently relevant, (from the significant effort which he has invested in Fontforge as a tool for his own use). Therefore George Williams is, (or likely will be) a biographically relevant individual. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.134.31.249 (talk) 19:32, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck getting an article on an open source programmer past WP:BIO.--Oneiros (talk) 23:14, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I once wrote to a colleague: "FontForge is simply a joy to use. Everything works just as you expect it to. The program's model is intuitive. The help is excellent. And it costs -- nothing. When using FontForge, one has the sense that a single mind finely crafted the design before finely crafting the implementation, And it looks beautiful. George Williams is my hero. He deserves some kind of award for FontForge." D.keenan (talk) 02:22, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

D.keenan - but did you ever use this program ? The interface is worse than awful, the workflow clunky, it's really not a great program. It would be right at home in DOS 3.3 It's just that there isn't much competition and none for the price. It works okay but this fawning over a rather poor program, jeeze 203.160.71.198 (talk) 05:55, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How in Blazes...

Can someone update the page to give suggestions on HOW TO INSTALL this silly thing? I got the download but I can't figure out what any of the files do - windows wants to open them all with media center! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.92.84.146 (talk) 22:49, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't run it under Windows, but I understand that you have to install Cygwin first. Step-by-step How-to information isn't really suitable for Wikipedia itself (though it could be on some related projects, such as Wikibooks etc.). AnonMoos (talk) 23:39, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This might help: FontForge install procedures for cygwin under MS Windows ARK (talk) 23:59, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In Ubuntu Linux, type these commands in the temrinal:

sudo apt-get install software-properties-common;

sudo add-apt-repository ppa:fontforge/fontforge;

sudo apt-get update;

sudo apt-get install fontforge

On macOS, first install homebrew, then type:

brew install fontforge

in the terminal.

I don't know about Windows, most Windows programs come in simple binaries that are easy to install, but you can make a virtual Ubuntu machine using Virtualbox and install it there. Tcarisland (talk) 02:18, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is no longer an issue. FontForge has since been ported to Windows, and can now be installed as simply as any other Windows application. Cygwin is no longer required. D.keenan (talk) 02:27, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on FontForge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111003062536/http://ospublish.constantvzw.org/typo/i-think-the-ideas-behind-it-are-beautiful-in-my-mind to http://ospublish.constantvzw.org/typo/i-think-the-ideas-behind-it-are-beautiful-in-my-mind

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:18, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

First release date

If the change from "PfaEdit" to "Fontforge" was basically just a cosmetic name change, and PfaEdit was first released in 2001, shouldn't the first release date be in 2001? AnonMoos (talk) 23:26, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]