Talk:Foley & Lardner

This article was nominated for deletion on November 19, 2006. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article was nominated for deletion on April 12, 2013. The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wisconsin Low‑importance

	Wisconsin portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

TheYoMma (talk · contribs) This user has declared a connection.

Requesting updates to this page

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

Jay Rothman is no longer Chairman and CEO at Foley & Lardner LLP. The new Chairman and CEO is Daljit Doogal. Can we please get this updated to reflect the change in leadership?

Cite: https://www.crainsdetroit.com/law/new-foley-lardner-ceo-daljit-doogal-takes-helm-amid-fight-talent

https://news.bloomberglaw.com/business-and-practice/foley-lardners-new-chair-sees-focus-on-fast-changing-sectors

Edit comment not consistent with the edit (see the changes shown in the DIFF listing)

This report is about [half of] the "Edit comment" for this edit:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Foley_%26_Lardner&diff=prev&oldid=890201445

That edit comment says:

(Added a notable employee Brian Hagedorn, who also worked for this law firm. And I added that Lisa Neubauer is a candidate for Wisconsin Supreme court.)
(Tag: Visual edit)

; but the portion of that edit comment after the word "And", -- (namely << "I added that Lisa Neubauer is a candidate for Wisconsin Supreme court." >>), -- does not agree with the changes made, according to the DIFF listing.

The problem

The change made, (other than the one involving adding Brian Hagedorn), was an update to the entry for "Joan F. Kessler, Wisconsin Court of Appeals Judge"; ...NOT to the entry for "Lisa Neubauer".

I am not sure whether the article is correct now ("as of" that "Revision as of 13:33, 30 March 2019" edit); but if it is, then that edit comment is wrong.

(Perhaps worse), if that edit comment is right, then the article is wrong now -- (that is, the addition of "and candidate for the Wisconsin Supreme Court," may have been done ...in the wrong place in the article).

Any comments?

Either way, [it seems that] something is wrong. --Mike Schwartz (talk) 07:53, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]