(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
(b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);[2] and
Given you are an experienced editor on articles about Disney characters and your efforts put into this elaborate research, I think I can quickly pass this article for GA. Just one small comment: the "Reception" section is a little bit lengthy in comparison with the general structure of the whole article. You may consider cutting unnecessary comments or comments from less-notable critics.
I'm sorry for reviewing this article too late. I was on the point of working on your nomination when a serious problem came up at my office, thus I couldn't spend much time online in the past month. Again, my sincere apology. —ALittleQuenhi (talk to me) 15:48, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
^ Compliance with other aspects of the Manual of Style, or the Manual of Style mainpage or subpages of the guides listed, is not required for good articles.
^This requirement is significantly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required of featured articles; it allows shorter articles, articles that do not cover every major fact or detail, and overviews of large topics.
^Vandalism reversions, proposals to split or merge content, good faith improvements to the page (such as copy editing), and changes based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply. Nominations for articles that are unstable because of unconstructive editing should be placed on hold.
^Other media, such as video and sound clips, are also covered by this criterion.
^The presence of images is not, in itself, a requirement. However, if images (or other media) with acceptable copyright status are appropriate and readily available, then some such images should be provided.