Talk:Flying Buffalo

	Games portal This article is part of WikiProject Board and table games, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to board games and tabletop games. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Board and table gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Board and table gamesTemplate:WikiProject Board and table gamesboard and table game articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Role-playing games Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Role-playing games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of role-playing games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Role-playing gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Role-playing gamesTemplate:WikiProject Role-playing gamesrole-playing game articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Arizona Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Arizona portal This article is supported by WikiProject Arizona (assessed as Low-importance).

This article was nominated for deletion on 9 October 2013. The result of the discussion was keep.

Rick Loomis didn't leave the Army 'til 1970. The company started not during that year but in 1972. I hereby amend. Tribune 20:27, 15 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Verification?

What's wrong with sources from the company's own web site? That's a primary source! I agree that if we had some independent source, that would be better, but their's nothing wrong with citing the actual stated history of the company being profiled, so in any case please leave the links there. -- Kaszeta 13:23, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The History of Play-by-Mail and Flying Buffalo

[1] (see page 2) - quite interesting and perhaps useful to extent the article. -- mkrohn 23:36, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Awards

http://www.flyingbuffalo.com/awards.htm Web Warlock (talk) 11:16, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Inc. versus Incorporated

I changed the naming convention in the lede from "Flying Buffalo Incorporated" to "Flying Buffalo Inc." since their website uses the latter and it does not appear that they are incorporated. It seems like Rick Loomis just took on the "Inc." as part of the company name.

I could be wrong, and if so, feel free to revert and point it out. Airborne84 (talk) 00:26, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Separate Company

Should the separate company link be referenced in the article instead of just Rick Loomis PBM Games? http://rickloomispbm.com/ Jokem (talk) 18:19, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jokem, external links shouldn't normally go inline in the text, but I think it would be OK to add it as a reference in the External links section at the end. Airborne84 (talk) 01:59, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is why I added in the talk page first. I will try my hand at putting in as a reference. OK, I tried putting the reference in, but either I cannot recall how this is done, or the manner in which this is done has changed. OK, I managed to do something, please check it out and see if I stepped on any rules. Jokem (talk) 06:47, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jokem, thanks. I moved the URL from the lead to External links since the lead doesn't require citations. Material there should simply reflect cited info in the main body and the Rick Loomis PBM info is noted (and cited) in the main body. I expanded the URL into a full citation using a template for consistency. Thanks for your interest. Airborne84 (talk) 21:56, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Airborne - I don't understand what you did. When I click the link, it goes to a Rolling for Initiative link, which is the second entry in the external links. Both links go to the same place. Jokem (talk) 02:15, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake. It's good now. Airborne84 (talk) 04:17, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]