Talk:Flunk
Appearance
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Needs disambiguity
[edit]This needs a disambiguity. I was looking for a history of the word flunk and its place in our culture.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cherylrenee (talk • contribs) 23:17, 7 June 2007.
- The article now has a disambiguation hatnote linking to the Wiktionary article for the word. __meco (talk) 14:14, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Native English reviewer needed
[edit]I enjoy this band but this article needs to be reviewed by a native english speaker. It does not read right. In regards to the disambiguity, I think there are other sources that would better serve the purpose of etemolgy of the word it's self. TurtleWarningCry 17:44, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Genre
[edit]I think the genre "electronic" is not sufficent description for this band. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.43.168.220 (talk) 20:24, December 2, 2008 (UTC)