Talk:Floss (musical)

This actually has a very interesting backstory/tangent.

I'll draft something up.

curley-bracket curley-bracket appropriate-wikitag close-curleybracket close-curleybracket.

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... I'll work on it, there is something here --PuZZleDucK (talk) 10:40, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... Article and references have been added by another user. --PuZZleDucK (talk) 00:18, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Proposed Deletion

Actually an unproduced musical is not unheard of.

For me the actual story is "he actually extracted money from spirit group for this c##p", but I was trying to be neutral. I feel rude deleting your tag, but that's what it said to do... to justify my actions, your tag lead to the following guidelines:

   "Significant coverage"       -> No original research was needed. I barely know who the joker is.
   "Reliable"                   -> Rolling stone magazine seems to have editorial integrity in this area.
   "Sources"                    -> The ABC in Australia is quite objective, and their coverage denotes notability.
   "Independent of the subject" -> Describes all references except Spirit Group, who are very biast, but have the most detailed coverage.
   "Presumed"                   -> Ok interest is only presumed... but mo people know of "Townshend" than "Jerry Herman"

So I feel all of your points have been addressed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PuZZleDucK (talk • contribs) 08:53, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]