Talk:Florida Trail

Florida Low‑importance

	Florida portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hiking trails (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hiking trails, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Hiking trailsWikipedia:WikiProject Hiking trailsTemplate:WikiProject Hiking trailsHiking trails articles

Backpacking (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Backpacking, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BackpackingWikipedia:WikiProject BackpackingTemplate:WikiProject BackpackingBackpacking articles

Major Expansion plans

I am organizing an effort for a major expansion of this article. If you wish to participate, please leave me a note. Carl M. Anglesea (talk) 21:22, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Florida Trail. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100525220144/http://www.gorp.com:80/parks-guide/travel-ta-national-scenic-trails-florida-trail-sidwcmdev_068967.html to http://www.gorp.com/parks-guide/travel-ta-national-scenic-trails-florida-trail-sidwcmdev_068967.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:51, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rating

I think Philoserf the High rating should only be given for especially significant routes, for the US a trail like the Appalachian trail, say. and in Canada the Trans Canada Trail. Also the England Coast Path. Otherwise Mid importance seems sufficient. The guidelines aren't emphatic and anyhow should be modified. Rwood128 (talk) 21:02, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Each National Scenic Trail, or other nations equivalent, has a place in some backpackers heart. Rather than use judgement case-by-case, perhaps on trail systems the editorial teams are not informed about, I like a clearer in or not criteria. At least until the editorial team can build an understanding that isn't gut feeling. —¿philoserf? (talk) 22:17, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My concern is pragmatic. If this Project aims to improve articles relating to backpacking doesn't there have to be a limit the number of possible high (and possibly mid) rated articles? Should all National Trails, the French GR, and European E networks, and so forth be rated high? If the Florida Trail article is high shouldn't I raise the rating for East Coast Trail from the Low, that I gave it, to high? It has a place in ~~some~~ many backpackers hearts. To be a little cheeky (sorry). Rwood128 (talk) 23:23, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your judgement is as good, or bad, as mine. I trust you. Go for it. We can deal with the any real differences as they arise. —¿philoserf? (talk) 23:32, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]