Talk:Flixton, Greater Manchester/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: INeverCry (talk · contribs) 19:05, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Prose is clear and well-written.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   References checked and fixed where needed.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Broad detailed coverage.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   Straight forward factual representation of subject.

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Stable.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Good images and captions.

7. Overall: See this GA discussion of the article during the review: User talk:Parrot of Doom/Archives/2012/March#Flixton. Should've done this here on the review page but this was my first review.

   Pass/Fail: