Jump to content

Talk:Flight Pattern/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
Passed. Amitchell125 (talk) 18:17, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Amitchell125 (talk · contribs) 20:28, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to review the article. AM

Review comments

[edit]

Lead section / infobox

[edit]
Understood, but please note that linking is not just about uncommon words, but can be used to "increase readers' understanding of the topic" (see WP:LINK). In view of this I would certain considering linking choreography, a key term in this article. Amitchell125 (talk) 17:33, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with your thoughts about choreography, and have wikilinked it. Z1720 (talk) 18:06, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Z1720. AM
  • Introduce Crystal Pite; Marcelino Sambé; Kristen McNally (here and where they first appear in the main article).
  • I don't know what you mean by "introduce". The Pite and Sambe are wikilinked, and their roles as choreographer and dancers are mentioned. I think any additional information about them would be off-topic. Z1720 (talk) 16:20, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
My apologies for not being clearer, I would for instance amend a one-act contemporary ballet by Crystal Pite to something like 'a one-act contemporary ballet by the Canadian choreographer and dancer Crystal Pite'. It shouldn't be necessary for readers to use links or have to read on so as to work out who a person is. This is particularly true in the lead section, which "may be the only portion of the article that [someone reads]". (see WP:LEAD). Amitchell125 (talk) 17:41, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Added that Pite is a Canadian choreographer. I don't want to put dancer here because I do not think she is performing anymore at this time (choreographer is her current occupation, dancer would be a previous occupation). Added "dancers" before Sambe and McNally's names.
  • The ballet won the Laurence Olivier Award for Best New Dance Production – I would add the year.
  • Add a comma after Light of Passage.
  • queues – I would elaborate on this a bit to ensure readers are clear about what is being referred to here, as queueing is not generally associated with ballet dancing.
  • I put "formations of queues" and wikilinked queue to help explain this.
  • Consider incorporating an image within the infobox (I can help upload a non-free image if you wish).
It looks fine to me. AM
  • Consider red-linking Light of Passage, as a work that could be considered to be notable in its right.

1 Choreography

[edit]
  • The external video is an excerpt (this should be made clear).
  • It is generally good practice for a link to appear whenever it first appears in a section (MOS:REPEATLINK), so the links made in the lead should reappear in the main text (i.e. in this section, and other link elsewhere): act; ballet; choreography; Pite (with her full name).
Thanks (I would link choreography though, see above).
Done, per above. Z1720 (talk) 18:11, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Link Marcelino Sambé (in the caption); crescendo.

2 Development

[edit]
  • Done
  • Introduce Lucía Piquero Álvarez.
  • Done
  • Nancy Bryant; Jay Gower Taylor; Tom Visser – are these individuals notable enough to mentioned here?
  • Since they were part of the production of the piece, I felt they should be mentioned. There are no FAs in dance productions, so I used film FAs as templates for the article structure; they often include various production credits and since Flight Pattern has so few, I included everyone that I could cite as involved in the production. Z1720 (talk) 16:50, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Understood. AM

3 Performances

[edit]
  • Introduce Sidi Larbi Cherkaoui.
I disagree, please see comment above about introducing. Amitchell125 (talk) 17:54, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I added "choreographer" before Cherkaoui. Z1720 (talk) 18:13, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • It finished its original run – ‘Flight Pattern finished its original run’, for the sake of clarity.
  • Christopher Wheeldon’s Within the Golden Hour – ‘Wheeldon’s Within the Golden Hour’.

4 Critical reviews

[edit]
  • Link repertoire.
  • Evening Standard is in italics.
  • Her choreography – ‘Pite’s choreography’.
  • described by reviewers as beautiful and a masterful showcase of ensemble choreography – as not all reviewers described the work in this way, I would put the words by Watts and Schabas in quote marks, and name them.
  • and avoided – the text needs to be amended here, as it reads as if the reviewers did this, not the work.
  • Sambé and McNally's performances were positively highlighted by reviewers – the citations don’t verify the text here, they only give two examples of positive reviews. The text should, I think, reflect this.
  • I removed the sentence, as I think the subsequent sentences give more specific detail about reviewer's comments on Sambe and McNally's performances.
  • Sambé's performance was called emotionally powerful - why emotionally? Neither of the sources use this word. Consider modifying to something like ‘Sambé's performance was called powerful by some reviewers’.
  • I changed the sentence to put Watts's comments in quotes.
  • while reviewers praised – ‘whilst other reviewers praised’?

More comments to follow shortly. AM

5 Themes and analysis

[edit]
  • I’m unclear why the first paragraph appears here, so late in the article. Consider moving it up, perhaps to the top of the article, under the title ‘Theme’.
  • I looked through some FAs on theatrical productions, and sections such as "Theme" and "Critical analysis" usually appear later in the article. I put the Theme after Development because I think it was easier for the reader to understand, and chronologically accurate, to explain Pite's influence in creating the piece before the critical analysis. Perhaps "Themes" should be placed before "Critical reviews"? Z1720 (talk) 17:33, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Understood—there's no hard and fast rule here (applying them is in part what GA reviews are about). I would move it up to where you suggest, though.
I swapped "Themes" and "Reviews", mostly because I think reviews should proceed the "Awards" section. Z1720 (talk) 18:15, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • The text of the second paragraph belongs within the choreography Section.

7.1 Citations

[edit]
  • As Ref 18 (Financial Times) cannot be accessed without subscribing, consider adding 'url-access=subscription'.
Many thanks. AM

7.2 Works cited

[edit]
  • The Oxford handbook of contemporary ballet - ‘ The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Ballet’.
[edit]
  • The external link doesn’t lead to any information about the work, and so should not appear here. There is an external link to the work from this website (found when a search is made, but it is a subscription only link, and so this should not be used either (WP:LINKSTOAVOID).

On hold

[edit]

I'm putting the article on hold for a week until 15 August to allow time for the issues raised to be addressed. Regards, Amitchell125 (talk) 14:18, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Passing

[edit]

Passing the article now, many thanks for all your work, and for introducing me to a great example of contemporary ballet. Amitchell125 (talk) 18:16, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Flight_Pattern/GA1&oldid=1169203452"