Talk:Flemming v. Nestor

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

Nonsubstantive edits

Dear fellow editors: I have made some cosmetic edits to this article. I express no opinion on whether the article accurately reflects the text of the court's decision, as I haven't had a chance to get to this (I think I studied this case in law school, but that was a thousand years ago).

I deleted the reference to the "holding" of the case, changing it to "result." I think that's a safer description until I or someone else has a chance to study the court's decision and work on this article some more. Yours, Famspear 20:12, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're making this sound more complicated than it is. For heaven's sake, the Flemming v. Nestor decision is written in plain English, easily understood by someone with a high school education and average command of the English language. It can be read and grasped in less than an hour. I've done it and I've never set foot in a law school in my life. —Quicksilver^{T @} 06:19, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

what is an alien? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.60.106.20 (talk) 20:28, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The term now links to the Wikipedia page defining it. Frumpet (talk) 13:56, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The link to the Cornell Law library in the floating right box is broken. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zeklandia (talk • contribs) 20:12, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

28 U.S.C. § 2282 was repealed in 1976. I made the link go to the page for § 2281, which notes the repeal of § 2282. I couldn't find the repealed text to link to it. It's probably out there somewhere. Frumpet (talk) 13:56, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Flemming v. Nestor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110111131226/http://www.historycooperative.org/journals/lhr/26.2/tani.html to http://www.historycooperative.org/journals/lhr/26.2/tani.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:36, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]