External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Flat rated. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:13, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

offended

"The engine output in this case will always remain the same, but when atmospheric conditions such as high temperatures and high altitude ("hot and high") reduce the power output of the engine it has more headroom before it falls below the limited maximum output."

My brain is completely offended by this sentence. His flat rating have to do with the engine management system? Is it supposed to mean that when natural conditions would reduce the power output, the engine compensates to stay at the rated power?? I wouldn't expect a jet turbine engine to make as much power at higher are temperatures at higher altitudes any more than I would expect a piston engine to do so, unless boosted. And since the first part didn't make sense the example doesn't make sense either.Whoever wrote this needs to write it better. And maybe the biggest concern should be whether the article belongs here or not. It is not sourced! And the external links have nothing to do with it. I've never removed an entire article before. It's practically gobbledygook has no sourcing whatsoever. Somebody tell me why I shouldn't do that here. The only entry on The Talk page is from a bot. I could be that nobody is monitoring this page. I'll try to come back in a couple of days and I might just remove my first Wikipedia article.Jackhammer111 (talk) 18:30, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]