Talk:Flashforward

Literature Low‑importance

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles

Lost

Can we just list lost as overall being a flashforward show rather then just some episodes? Ehccheehcche (talk) 03:16, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Naruto Shippuuden

Should we mention that Naruto Shippuuden had a flash forward in the beggining of episode 1? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.50.197.11 (talk) 12:58, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Scrubs

Do we actually have a source that says that scrubs uses "flashforwards"? Or is this just someone's original research? Unless it's sourced I can't see any reason to list Scrubs here: Scrubs' apparent "flashforwards" never actually happen, they are mere comedic hypotheticals, and so hardly count as examples of "this is the future". 163.1.146.190 (talk) 04:11, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, I removed it. --Cameron Scott (talk) 11:35, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Predating?

The name flashforward suggests further in time. Does it really span across to the past? -- 203.171.195.221 (talk) 11:26, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Final Destination

I'm removing Final Destination and its sequels from the list of films on the following grounds; if I'm wrong please correct me!

Each film begins with a vision one of the characters has of a disaster occuring, but because of the vision the disaster occurs differently (more people survive)
The vision is not what you have in, say, Lost, where it's just an interruption of the storyline for the benefit of viewers, it's actually an experience had by a character in real time, like a daydream
The vision is not necessarily the future, since theoretically the person who has it could alter anything to prevent it from happening
There are more flashforward-like episodes throughout the films, but these take the form of foreshadowing - images or patterns relevant to an imminent are seen

90.192.191.74 (talk) 19:08, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of examples.

I've removed this, as if not kept in check it could be added to ad infinitum. If examples are going to be added, it should be discussed why they are examples, otherwise it's pretty meaningless. Rob Sinden (talk) 11:51, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think Damages should be added to the list. It used flashforwards extensively as part of the main story narrative. 24.70.57.20 (talk) 17:31, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not quite sure if I understand the concept, but could that tv show, "I Didn't Do It" be considered an example? I'm new to wiki and I'm not familiar with all the customs but shouldn't the list of examples be a separate page/catalog?

Make History

The line which says

In December 2009, it was announced that British soap opera Hollyoaks would make history by flashforwarding six months in the future, during May 2010 for a special episode.

does not quite explain why this show having a flash forward "would make history" (if other shows had flash forwards before it, then — as written as quoted above — it would not make any sense). Apparently (after some investigating) the making history is that this show will be the first UK soap opera to do so. Beyond it just being rewritten, I would rather propose that this whole line just be deleted because it sounds more sensationalism than actually newsworthy (or rather, encyclopaedia worthy). Are we going to list every new television genre "making history" when they have their first falshforward (I would say "no")? So, unless we want to start listing things like "on such-and-such date, Czech sci-fi animated television (ages 3-5) made history when such-and-such show..." lets just delete it. — al-Shimoni (talk) 00:54, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]