Talk:Flag of Bonaire

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Flag of Bonaire article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Caribbean: Caribbean Netherlands Low‑importance

	Caribbean portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caribbean, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the countries of the Caribbean on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.CaribbeanWikipedia:WikiProject CaribbeanTemplate:WikiProject CaribbeanCaribbean articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Caribbean Netherlands work group (assessed as High-importance).

Heraldry and vexillology

Flag of Bonaire is within the scope of the Heraldry and vexillology WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of heraldry and vexillology. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Heraldry and vexillologyWikipedia:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillologyTemplate:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillologyheraldry and vexillology articles

Netherlands C‑class

	Netherlands portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Noun–verb agreement in number

The first sentence of the second paragraph used to read as follows:

The triangles are separated by a white strip, inside of which is a black compass and a red six-pointed star.

I changed is to are in the final clause. The subject of the verb is "a black compass and a red six-pointed star," which is clearly a plural subject, as it has two parts, both of which are subjects of the verb.

SiBr4 reverted my change, contending, "'Is' refers to the white strip" (see the page history). This is clearly in error. The black compass and red six-pointed star are the things that are inside of the white strip (replaced by the pronoun which in the clause). "[A] white strip" is the object of the preposition by, and thus cannot be the subject of any verb.

Let me make it even more obvious. The sentence can be re-written as two sentences, without changing the meaning whatsoever, like this:

The triangles are separated by a white strip. A black compass and a red six-pointed star are inside of the white strip.

Now, the final clause (under debate) has been converted to a simple sentence, in which the subject and verb are even more plainly apparent. This should leave absolutely no doubt for anyone with an elementary understanding of English grammar.

SiBr4, please don't make this inaccurate change again. This is a very simple grammatical issue. Identification of the subject and verb in clause is beyond debate. The subject is plural, so the verb must be plural to agree with the number of the subject. Thank you. Holy (talk) 16:35, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My fault. If the sentence was of the form "the stripe contains a compass and a star" the verb would be singular, but of course the compass and star are the subject in this case. SiBr₄ (talk) 18:11, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]