Talk:Fitness First

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Fitness First is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Untitled

I think some reference should be made to Fitness First contracts and how difficult it is to leave the club without incurring heavy fees or direct debits for the rest of your life---

219.90.251.132 (talk) 00:40, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Uhhhhhhhhh... Whatever bright spark decided to add a quote 'known for ripping off members' or other such stupidities, don't. It's idiotic and I've removed it. It's fair enough to talk about contact terms, but it's not ok to make broad sweeping statements like that.

219.90.251.132 (talk) 00:40, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fitness first is one of the largest fitness centres in the world

This article has serious issues and the controversies section in particular is problematic. I've removed the reference to employing a debt collection agency in the UK to pursue members who don't pay amounts owing. This is clearly not a "controversy" given that it is common practice for companies to recover accounts receivables. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geenfietsen (talk • contribs) 15:02, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

International or Australian?

Fitness First is an international company, yet this article seems to focus explicitly on Australia, even mentioning some seemingly trivial "complaints" about the company, which are more to do with that specific location than the company as a whole (e.g. the person getting pushed down the stairs). I recommend a lot of the Australia-specific stuff be deleted, unless it is in the form of an example. The complaints section should be trimmed to what's relevant for Fitness First, not for individual locations. Thoughts? MatttK (talk) 22:55, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Fitness First. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:25, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]